![]() | blitzgrambo: @1250dougrussell Hell - we could be off covering any of the local D1s - UW in Hawaii, UWM In Texas or Marquette at the BC - ok, nevermind MU about 51 minutes ago |
![]() | hewish: or the time i was in the elevator with the head coach of the marquette mens bball team and he told me he would hook me up with tourney tix about 16 hours ago |
![]() | nholevas: Marquette Inn No 4 Restaurant on #Yelp: Good food for the price. A bit like Denny's or Perkins. link about 17 hours ago |
![]() | PitaBros: Happy Monday everyone! We will be at Marquette on Wells all day or until we sell out. Remember to grab a free cookie! See ya round noon! about 21 hours ago |
| By Steve Czaban Special to OnMilwaukee.com E-mail author | Author bio More articles by Steve Czaban |
| Published April 9, 2008 at 5:25 a.m. |
|
So, Tom Crean left Marquette high and dry and bolted for Indiana.
Boo hoo.
Get over it, Golden Eagles fans.
What, did you really believe that 10-year contract nonsense? Were you buying that Crean had found a "home for life" at the gritty, gutsy, urban basketball program where Al McGuire once famously coached the Warriors to glory?
Please.
These guys are mercenaries with cute little American flag pins on their suited lapels, and Nike money in their back pockets. They know that the kind of love in college basketball is not the kind you swear to on a Bible during your wedding ceremony (or a court case).
It is highly conditional and subject to just two bad losing seasons in a row.
I know everybody really liked what Crean did. He delivered a Final Four. (Or, more accurately, the second-best guard in the NBA when healthy, Dwyane Wade, delivered it.) Crean recruited well. He sounded good in interviews. He held his own at the Midwest school thrust into the meat grinder known as the Big East Conference.
But, let's not make him out to be the next John Wooden.
In fact, there are only about three schools in Division I where if the current coach left, the fan base would have a right to crawl under the blankets and call in sick to work:
Duke with Mike Krzyzewski.
Florida with Billy Donovan.
Georgetown with John Thompson III.
This is not to say that those guys are the three "best" coaches in college basketball. It's just that traditional basketball powers like UCLA, North Carolina, Kansas, Kentucky and Indiana will always get the next guy they really want.
Whomever follows Coach K at Duke is in for one helluva a tough ride. Because before Krzyzewski's arrival, the program had spotty success at best. despite Lon Kruger's one brief fling with the Final Four, Florida was a football school before Donovan showed up on campus. And Georgetown would just be a small urban Jesuit school with a lot of cool highlights from the 1980s if John Thompson's son hadn't come back to restore the luster.
Everybody else, relax. There are more hot young, aggressive, smart assistants waiting to make their name with your letterhead.
As for your new guy, Brent "Buzz" Williams, I couldn't pick him out of a lineup that included Buzz Lightyear, Buzz Aldrin and Buzzy Bavasi.
But, I hear he's a real recruiting dynamo, which is music to my ears if I'm a Marquette fan. College basketball is so heavily weighted on three things, everything else hardly matters:
1. Recruiting.
2. Recruiting.
3. Recruiting.
Sorry, does that sound too much like the old real estate axiom about "location?"
Fine, you can throw in "scheduling" and "media relations" as secondary concerns to the almighty task of getting the horses to pull the wagon.
Every coach who makes the D-1 level has sufficient X's and O's to keep players from running around in circles. The one big area that involves a learning curve on the court is actual game night tactics -- when to run, when to grind, when to foul, substitutions and the like. You only get that skill with time, so you might as well get a guy started on that learning curve sooner, rather than later.
If you are still heartbroken over Crean's departure, at least be glad he didn't move to a conference rival. Plus, he's got NCAA sanctions awaiting him, and a roster that cleared out faster than a corporate conference room at 3 p.m. on Friday.
Meanwhile, just say to yourself: "In Buzz we trust." Print some cool T-shirts, and carry on as you have been.
|
20 comments about this article. Post a comment / write a review. |
Posted by High_Life_Man on April 16, 2008 at 9:49 a.m. (report)
Carriejp, Yes. I hate it when people use information that is incorrect (blatent at that).
| Rate this: |
Posted by AlfromtheGrave on April 11, 2008 at 2:44 p.m. (report)
Go Marquette!
| Rate this: |
Posted by carriejp on April 11, 2008 at 2:35 p.m. (report)
Now that I finally got through all the e-mails between Al and High Life Man, I wonder about you two, too. Is it really worth getting so upset over your schools of preference?
| Rate this: |
Posted by carriejp on April 11, 2008 at 2:19 p.m. (report)
Scottage Cheese, why are you so bitter and full of hatred for Marquette? Thou doth protest too much...
| Rate this: |
Posted by High_Life_Man on April 10, 2008 at 8:33 a.m. (report)
Al, again, the UW athletics department is self-supporting. This means that the department receives NO tax dollars. If you don't believe this, I'm sure the state's general accounting office (as well as many third-party citizen watchdog groups) has documents proving this. Also, in order to win an argument, you need to use correct facts. UW's 2007 enrollment numbers: Enrollment, faculty, staff and alumni (Fall 2007) Undergraduate students Freshmen 5,571 Sophomores 6,078 Juniors 7,803 Seniors 9,547 Total 28,999 Graduate students 8,860 Professional students Law 881 Medicine and Public Health 819 Veterinary Medicine 313 Audiology 32 Pharmacy 518 Total 2,563 Special students 1,619 Total enrolled students 42,041 Employees 16,255 Faculty 2,054 Living alumni 362,577 http://www.wisc.edu/about/facts/community.php#community A lot less than the 70,000 students you claim UW has. Marquette pales in comparison to UW in all aspects except one: you have a dental school. UW is superior in academics, athletics, research dollars (I believe it is #2 behind Johns Hopkins University - the school's WARF foundation also holds the patent on stem cell research, something will bring billions of dollars back to the state), number of Peace Corps volunteers and Fortune 500 CEOs (last time I read, we were #2 behind Harvard). Who is the naive one now?
| Rate this: |
| Top Clicks | Top Searches | Most Talkbacks |
|
|