![]() | mistresscaitlin: Off to Zielinski's Ballroom in Pulaski, WI for another night of NWA WI wrestling. 7 p.m. Be there, or I'll turn you into a toad! about 19 hours ago |
![]() | mizou_13: US Mint Gold Buffalo Bullion Coins Sold Out, Other Gold Coins Suspended or Limited By Michael Zielinski link about 21 hours ago |
![]() | WebForging: @AccidentalWI Was that think tank at the Sugar Maple or the Tonic Tavern? ;-) about 5 days ago |
![]() | northjerseyfood: River Edge Diner getting a liquor license, according to a public notice. Figure it'll go down in a month or so. about 6 days ago |
![]() |
"Each application is so unique and so different from all the other ones. There's no way you can take a brush and go across the board," says Ald. Tony Zielinksi. | ![]() |
![]() |
| By Andy Tarnoff Publisher E-mail author | Author bio More articles by Andy Tarnoff |
| Published Feb. 17, 2009 at 2:39 p.m. |
|
(page 2)
"There are so many variables," he says. "Each application is so unique and so different from all the other ones. There's no way you can take a brush and go across the board."
Zielinski points to the Highbury Pub, 2322 S. Kinnickinnic Ave., as an instance of a "slam drunk" liquor license.
"That place was a hole in the wall before they bought it," says Zielinski. "They sunk hundreds of thousands of dollars in there, fixed it up with its soccer theme. It has its own unique ambience."
Recently, the alderman went to bat for two of Highbury's neighbors, Café Centraal and the soon-to-open Tonic Tavern, 2335 S. Kinnickinnic Ave.
"(Owner Paul Jonas) will have some live music, and it's on KK, not in a residential area. It's going to be a very vibrant, high-energy area, which is what people want."
When it's time to decide whether a new bar gets its license, the Common Council hears arguments from both sides. It also gets input from the City Attorney's office, which provides the Licensing Committee with a legal opinion on all applications.
"I have people who come and testify, one way or the other," says Zielinski.
In the case of Tonic Tavern, neighboring bar owners from Highbury to Lulu went to bat for Jonas. And, when Jonas was interviewed for the preview story on OnMilwaukee.com, he admitted that felt nervous throughout his hearing -- but Zielinski says he didn't need to be.
"That's the type of business I envisioned coming into (the neighborhood)," he says.
Of course, every bar in Milwaukee isn't adding to its neighborhood's value, but Zielinski says it's hard for a tavern to lose its liquor license once it has one. These businesses have a "legal property right interest in that license," he says.
Says Zielinski, "It's very difficult to not renew or to revoke that license. You have to establish a strong record of illegal or problematic activity with respect to that particular establishment. If you're a new application, you do not have any such legal property right interest in that liquor license.
"A lot of the new ones get turned down," says Zielinski, but the reason aldermen have a good success rate in passage of bars they vouch for is because they know the neighborhood's dynamics and have already spoken with the potential applicant.
That's why Zielinksi suggests a bar owner talk with his or her alderman first. "They should get a feel as to what the lay of the land is," he says.
Of course, an applicant can ignore the alderperson's advice and go straight to the Common Council, but Zielinski notes that most of the time, the council defers to the member most familiar with his or her district.
"If someone has a good business plan, and is willing to spend some money and it's the right location, they shouldn't have a problem," he says.
<< Back
Page 2 of 2 (view all on one page)
|
3 comments about this article. Post a comment / write a review. |
Posted by alba on Feb. 19, 2009 at 11:48 a.m. (report)
Today's newspaper highlights the shady liquor licensing deals. Bob Bauman is one of top characters in this sick drama and guess what - he's against requiring alderman to create public paper trails of their dealings with bar owners. This is exactly what got Michael McGee in trouble but Bauman doesn't see the value in public transparency. He'd prefer to keep things secret and force the taverns to play his game. Aldermanic privilege is not a good thing.
| Rate this: |
Posted by alba on Feb. 18, 2009 at 1:57 p.m. (report)
The Aldermen do hold McGee-type power over the applicants. If you don't play by their rules than you won't get your license. Some of those rules can lean to the shady side. You'd better have never said a disparaging word about your Alderman, that's for sure. It can truly border on criminal.
| Rate this: |
Posted by ChateauDweller on Feb. 18, 2009 at 9:34 a.m. (report)
Talk to the alderman first? I would think hiring an experienced attorney famillar with city politics and licensing would be much better advice. You'll probably save some McGee-influence-cash too.
| Rate this: |
| Top Clicks | Top Searches | Most Talkbacks |