Sign in | Register now Like us on FacebookLike Us | Follow us on TwitterFollow Us

Milwaukee's Daily Magazine for Sunday, Nov. 23, 2014

Sun
Hi: 42
Lo: 23
Mon
Hi: 29
Lo: 18
Advertise on OnMilwaukee.com

In Bars & Clubs Commentary

Sharp's vs. O'Doul's.

Take the Milwaukee challenge: Sharp's vs. O'Doul's


"Bar Month" at OnMilwaukee.com – brought to you by Absolut, Avion, Fireball, Pama, Red Stag and 2 Gingers – is back for another round! The whole month of February, we're serving up intoxicatingly fun articles on bars and clubs – including guides, the latest trends, bar reviews, the results of our Best of Bars poll and more. Grab a designated driver and dive in!

A couple years ago during bar month, we put two local non-alcoholic brews to the test and Miller's Sharp's beat Pabst NA, 4-2.

This time, we took that local winner and stood it side by side with O'Doul's, manufactured by Miller's top national competition, Anheuser-Busch. Once again, Sharp's sliced through the competition.

Here's what we had to say...

Matt Mueller
Staff writer
Pick: Sharp's

Let me be clear: Neither of these non-beer beers technically "wins" in my opinion. In a competition with actual beers, they wouldn't even be good enough to win one of those "You participated!" ribbons they hand out at kids' sporting events. They perfectly live up to the reputation of beer-flavored water.

If you forced me to drink another one, however, I guess I'd go with Sharp's. It's a bit smoother, and though I don't like to use the word "drinkability" ... it has a decent, easy drinkability. It was the one I enjoyed drinking the most (in a really loose interpretation of the word enjoy). Sharp's wins this particular battle, but real beer wins the war.

Jim Owczarski
Sports editor
Pick: Sharp's

This was interesting for me, as my distaste for beer has been well-documented, but I went into the tasting with an open mind.

But, since I'm not a beer fan, it made me partial to Sharp's because it didn't taste like beer at all. Both products were watery, and O'Doul's definitely tasted like watered down beer, but Sharp's was just sort of ... there. It looked like beer, and if I had to take one or the other, it would be that.

Molly Snyder
Senior writer
Pick: O'Doul's

Although Sharp's had more flavor, I did not care for the flavor of the flavor, and so, by default, I pick O'Doul's because it actually had less flavor, tasted more like water and therefor I can at least say it's "refreshing." I would not choose to drink either of these, however, if I wanted to refrain from alcohol. I would likely pick a root beer instead.

Bobby Tanzilo
Managing editor
Pick: Sharp's

Both of these pale brews have similar body and head, which is to say not a lot of either, but one had considerably more flavor. While Sharp's was the paler of the two in color (O'Doul's boasts a more straw yellow hue), it is heavy on maltiness. Though I wouldn't likely order either of these – if I was eschewing alcohol, I'd have a soda – I prefer the Sharp's because the O'Doul's simply didn't taste like anything.

Colton Dunham
Editorial intern
Pick: Sharp's

Sharp's is a lighter beer without a distinct flavor. I suppose I'd compare it to something along the lines of Coors Light, a beer that's bland but tolerable if there aren't any other choices. O'Doul's is more bitter and it's definitely not a beer that I'd drink often, if ever again.

Ashley Weber
Editorial intern
Pick: O'Doul's

Sharp's was eminiscent of water. Not much to note about this one by way of flavor. Although I could distinguish some sort of flavor in the O'Doul's, the flavor fell flat. If I had to choose one over the other, surely I would chose this one, but I would be left unsatisfied, to say the least.

Talkbacks


Post a comment / write a review.

Facebook Comments

Disclaimer: Please note that Facebook comments are posted through Facebook and cannot be approved, edited or declined by OnMilwaukee.com. The opinions expressed in Facebook comments do not necessarily reflect those of OnMilwaukee.com or its staff.