![]() | lovethislife125: What good would it do for Eric Holder or any of them to resign. Obama seems to have an endless supply of corrupt people at his disposal. about 29 seconds ago |
![]() | hysperia: 54% of Americans believe #torture is "often" or "sometimes" justifiable! link #p2 about 2 minutes ago |
![]() | PinkStarr: Or Candy Flip! RT @xenijardin: "After you come down from the Obama LSD , you can take some Obama ecstasy tablets." link about 3 minutes ago |
![]() | goose776: Higher taxes are on the way, like it or not Bush tax cuts expire next year. about 4 minutes ago |
![]() | 32bpwr3: Will Iran Help or Hinder Obama in Afghanistan? - Tehran quietly helped the U.S. overthrow the Taliban in 2001. But ... link about 4 minutes ago |
| By Jennifer Morales Special to OnMilwaukee.com E-mail author More articles by Jennifer Morales |
| Published Oct. 4, 2006 at 4:55 p.m. |
|
Last week the U.S. Senate voted to allow George Bush to torture prisoners and hold them indefinitely in prison. They also agreed to allow him to define what "torture" is, and to admit evidence against these prisoners that was obtained by questionable means. Thirty-four senators (32 Democrats, one Republican, and one Independent) opposed Bush's detainee bill. Those 34 senators are true American heroes, defending us against a president who just doesn't believe our Constitution or our laws apply to his own behavior.
We Americans can make all the pretty noises we want about sharing our great system of liberty-and-justice-for-all with the rest of the world, but observers everywhere are calling us on the fact that we no longer practice it here at home. Bush's torture and kangaroo court bill only adds credence to this perception.
For a little while, three Republican senators, John McCain, Lindsey Graham and John Warner, put up a good fight against the most egregious aspects of the bill, particularly those that would put Americans in danger by gutting the U.S.'s commitment to the Geneva Conventions on prisoner treatment. They caved last week, however, to a version of the bill that gave Bush three quarters of what he wanted, as well as plenty of room to do dainty rhetorical dances around the meanings of "torture" and "enemy combatant."
One of the senators who voted against Bush's torture bill was Illinois Democrat Barack Obama. Obama predicts that our senators' failure to uphold the foundations of justice will come back to bite us. He asserted that the work that was done on the detainee bill was shoddy and quickly done, thanks to the urgent political demands of the November elections. Calling the Senate's deliberations "a debate over the fundamental human rights of the accused," he noted that, "When we're sloppy and cut corners, we are undermining those very virtues of America that will lead us to success in winning this war."
Obama is coming to speak in Milwaukee on Oct. 31, in support of Gov. Doyle's re-election campaign, as is former President Clinton, on the 24th. I hope both of these eloquent politicians will take these opportunities to share their thoughts about what Wisconsinites can do to defend ourselves and our American values against a president run amok.
The passage of the detainee bill reminds me of that bumper sticker, popular a few years back, that says, "No one died when Clinton lied." Clinton lied to us, it's true. But at least he was disagreeing with the American public on what the definition of the word "is" is. Better that than finding out the hard way what Bush's definition of "torture" is, and what it means for our soldiers abroad.
|
11 comments about this article. Post a comment / write a review. |
Posted by OMCreader on Oct. 9, 2006 at 7:54 p.m. (report)
Cozen Beguile said: Matt- Thanks! PEACE!
| Rate this: |
Posted by OMCreader on Oct. 9, 2006 at 10:22 a.m. (report)
matt said: cozen - your an idiot
| Rate this: |
Posted by OMCreader on Oct. 9, 2006 at 10:04 a.m. (report)
Cozen Beguile said: Paul- You are correct! I was testing Matt with my own spin. That is what I do best. LOL! PEACE!
| Rate this: |
Posted by OMCreader on Oct. 9, 2006 at 8:49 a.m. (report)
Paul said: Cozen - Actually, Bill Clinton was in office as president in 1993 when the first attack happened on the WTC. Bush Sr. was president from 1988-1992. Clinton was sworn-in in Jan of '93. Sorry...
| Rate this: |
Posted by OMCreader on Oct. 7, 2006 at 11:21 a.m. (report)
Cozen Beguile said: Matt- I think you may have had a talk radio overdose. The first attack by Al-Qaeda (on our soil) was the first attack on the World Trade Center. It was 1993 and Bush Sr. was in office. Why didn't Bush Sr. wipe out Al-Queda then? He let them run amuck and allowed the future attacks on the Cole and the Trade Center! See how silly your point is? Lets not forget that George Sr. and Ronald armed Al-Qaeda and Iraq. How did that work out for us? Hmm? I wonder how Iran/Contra is going to play out? PEACE!
| Rate this: |
|
Oct. 20, 2007 I got a little heated at an MPS school board meeting this week. The board was gathered ... |
|
Oct. 07, 2007 As a middle-schooler, I wanted to be Indiana Jones. I was always digging holes in the ... |
|
Sept. 22, 2007 To celebrate our birthdays, Tina and I bought tickets for each other to this past Wednesday's ... |
|
Sept. 15, 2007 Have you heard about the lesbian gang epidemic? |
|
Sept. 01, 2007 When I heard about U.S. Senator Larry Craig getting busted for soliciting gay sex, I laughed ... |
| Top Clicks | Top Searches | Most Talkbacks |