![]() | Beautyblkb: Keep Mean Muggin Me on the Internet u n ur 10 kids; R u mad that ur welfare check aint in the mail or that i just shut U down? smh about 49 seconds ago |
![]() | amandaomega: I think glee knows that I don't have a tv or internet and is waiting for me before airing new episodes. Thanks guys. about 2 minutes ago |
![]() | flangy: Apparently we have to re-regegister something-something with ADP. HI-LARIOUS that it scolds you to use "Internet Explorer 6 (or higher)" about 4 minutes ago |
![]() | ShynJAmero: @flawlessmi did you see the 106 one or the internet one? about 5 minutes ago |
![]() |
How long will it be before you can get wireless Internet everywhere in Milwaukee? |
| By Bobby Tanzilo Managing Editor E-mail author | Author bio More articles by Bobby Tanzilo |
| Published Aug. 3, 2005 at 5:41 a.m. |
|
Back in April, the City of Philadelphia announced that it would expand its Wi-Fi network to cover the city's entire 135 square miles. The "Wireless Philadelphia" plan would sell computer users access for $20 a month, putting the city's program into direct competition with broadband services sold by commercial enterprises.
Of course, some in Milwaukee have wondered if something similar will happen here, where, at the moment, just two downtown parks are alive with bits and bytes at no cost to users.
"I guess the answer is we've been trying to figure out how to do it," says the city's Chief Information Officer Randy Gschwind. "It's in the two parks now, and we've been talking to Time Warner and SBC about doing it elsewhere."
Although rumors abound that Brady Street and the Historic Third Ward will become the next "hot zones," Gschwind says there is no specific plan on paper at the moment.
Part of the problem is funding and management of a program that is typically a commercial, rather than governmental, enterprise.
"The mayor doesn't think government should be competing with the private sector," says Gschwind, adding, "The problem is the city doesn't have the money to fund it, and we don't think the city should be funding it."
But don't think the city isn't working to make broadband more accessible and more useful.
Gschwind says that the police and fire departments are working to get set up to use broadband to transmit the piles of information currently sent over costly cellular service.
"We're trying to get public safety up and then expand it," says Gschwind. "As of now police are buying cellular service to send data."
In the meantime, the city is working with the Washington, DC-based non-profit One Economy to explore getting broadband access to economically depressed areas of Milwaukee.
According to Gschwind, the project -- which is currently in the planning stage -- will help Mayor Tom Barrett achieve one of his goals.
"The mayor's major objective is to get the benefits of broadband to low income populations."
But low income or otherwise, certainly the private sector will want to be involved in the broadbanding of Brew City.
"Obviously we're interested. We're always looking for opportunities to benefit our customers, and expanding our Wi-Fi footprint is one of the ways we do that," says Sarah Silva, a spokesperson for SBC, which already works with the city in bringing wi-fi to Cathedral Square and Pere Marquette Parks Downtown.
Although Silva won't comment on any potential discussions with the city, she doesn't think that cheap, widespread Wi-Fi will hurt SBC.
"It's complimentary to our DSL business, and there are still situations where both are relevant," says Silva. "We obviously have the information technology to be providing Internet services, and we believe our expertise lies in that. We really think this is part of our business that will continue to grow and develop."
(Note: OnMilwaukee.com designed the start page for the city's wireless network available at Cathedral and Pere Marquette Parks.)
|
22 comments about this article. Post a comment / write a review. |
Posted by OMCreader on Aug. 5, 2005 at 5:23 p.m. (report)
pails said: dear god, what a horrible idea. please, keep wi-fi in the private sector. already, community businesses are making the internet more and more accessible. it will take some patience, but it will happen.
| Rate this: |
Posted by OMCreader on Aug. 5, 2005 at 1:39 p.m. (report)
Chris said: I live in an apartment building in the Third Ward and I pick up 5-10 various wireless routers, the overlap doesn't hurt my computer one bit as long as I have the basic security functions up and running. If someone hacks onto your laptop while you're online wirelessly, then maybe you should increase your security measures much the same as you would add safety features to your house if you lived in a high-crime area. And why must Milwaukee always be LAST to catch up to everyone else in nearly everything we do from business development to technology to trends, etc? For once can't we be at the forefront of a trend and lead the way? Why are we soooo afraid? A city-wide wireless network is not that expensive to set up and run and could easily be paid for by those who subscribe to it thus costing the taxpayers nothing. FELLOW MILWAUKEEANS - DO NOT FEAR PROGRESS AS OUR UN-COMMON COUNCIL HAS!!!
| Rate this: |
Posted by OMCreader on Aug. 5, 2005 at 12:20 p.m. (report)
dan said: pabstcity was suppossed to have way more than 20 retailers and restaurants.
| Rate this: |
Posted by OMCreader on Aug. 4, 2005 at 11:04 p.m. (report)
128bitwep said: Wifi does not interfere with pacemakers. The majority of hospitals use 802.11 for all sorts of devices.
| Rate this: |
Posted by OMCreader on Aug. 4, 2005 at 3:52 p.m. (report)
CONCERNED said: The city of Milwaukee should not be the agency who pays for wifi. Most people do not use it. It would only benefit a small amount of the citizens of Milwaukee.
| Rate this: |
| Top Clicks | Top Searches | Most Talkbacks |