![]() | CyannSentry: @smpfilms um.... isn't it free?? Besides, it's your song, you have the right to charge or not. Artists don't just hand out their paintings. about 3 minutes ago |
| Joe_Poe: Has feminine odor itching got you down? Try Free Credit Report dot com, or Extenze... damn late night TV commercials. about 4 hours ago |
![]() | DJSupaCake: @V_nkotbgirl U can hear the 1st 2 or 3 hrs w/o paying. IDK what's goin on now~ all NK's songs, no commercials! been on since 4pm! about 5 hours ago |
![]() |
Sales were surprisingly brisk at this weekend's "starving artists" sale in Brookfield. |
| By Andy Tarnoff Publisher E-mail author | Author bio More articles by Andy Tarnoff |
| Published Jan. 5, 2009 at 1:59 p.m. |
|
For as long as I remember watching commercials on TV, I remember seeing ads for "starving artists" shows coming to Milwaukee. When I was a kid, I thought the artists were literally starving, and I felt badly for them. As I got older, I remainined mildly intrigued with buying a "sofa-sized" painting for no more than $59.
Fortunately, my wife shares my appreciation for kitsch, and while we set our sights incredibly low, we finally took the plunge and attended a starving artists show this weekend at the Brookfield Sheraton Hotel.
I'm glad none of the starving artists were actually on hand -- I imagine they work in a sweat shop in China or Mexico -- because we spent a half hour giggling at the "fine art," and it turns out we weren't alone.
A lot of people actually turned out for the event, and most seemed legitimately impressed with the various paintings of Mediterranean scenes, flower vases and streets of old Paris. A few people, like us, came for the irony of it all -- buying mass-produced, generic art at rock-bottom prices.
Indeed, I thought a lot of the paintings were technically well-done. Most, but not all, were much nicer than what I created when my parents gave me some oil paints and a painting book when I was 9.
But of the hundreds of paintings on display, we ultimately found only three that we could actually imagine buying. Two were pretty, but not distinctive enough to hang in our house without feeling guilty and / or tacky. However, we discovered one abstract and colorful painting that could potentially work in the early '60s-themed rec room that my dad and I are building, and we settled on a 24x36-inch version for a mere $59.
Of course, the paintings come on unframed canvas, so we felt compelled to buy a $49 frame. The traveling staff that almost resembled carnies promptly stapled it together for us. In the end, we dropped $108, plus tax, on a large and ridiculous piece of "modern art."
Now, however, I know what a starving artists sale is all about, and I'm confident that I won't need to return. I'm also sure I'm the owner of a giant painting that will become the center of ridicule by our daughter (when she learns to speak), and I fully expect her to take it to college in 18 years and hang it in her dorm room.
Hey, our starving artist painting might just be her generation's velvet Elvis. That notion, alone, is easily worth $108.
|
3 comments about this article. Post a comment / write a review. |
|
Friday A while ago, I wrote a blog about how voicemail has started to annoy me. But lately, I ... |
|
Wednesday A funny little thing happened last Thursday, as the editorial staff of OnMilwaukee.com ... |
|
June 27, 2009 Milwaukee's Bay Dariz is in a new band called Some Hear Explosions, and I knew it would ... |
|
June 25, 2009 When I heard about Michael Jackson's death this afternoon, I must admit I was neither ... |
|
June 24, 2009 When I came home from work today and stepped inside my house, it was as if I sat down ... |
| Top Clicks | Top Searches | Most Talkbacks |