![]() | womenwotw: Is Sarah Palin animal, vegetable or mineral - new Palinism "birther" link about 14 minutes ago |
![]() | tmiller1212: Tyler wonders if a Sarah Palin/Hillary Clinton or Hillary Clinton/Sarah Pailn Presidential Ticket in 2012 would bring a whole lotta heal... about 53 minutes ago |
![]() | martinsmac: Are people in the States reading the Sarah Palin book out of some kind of morbid fascination, or is it because they think she's hot? about 3 hours ago |
![]() |
The Parent Posse weighs in every month about a parenting-related issue. |
| By Molly Snyder Edler OnMilwaukee.com Staff Writer E-mail author | Author bio More articles by Molly Snyder Edler |
| Published Sept. 8, 2008 at 5:10 a.m. |
|
This month, the OnMilwaukee Parent Posse puts political views aside, and looks at Republican Vice Presidential nominee Sarah Palin as a parent.
OnMilwaukee.com posed the question, "Do you think it's crazy or admirable that Sarah Palin is running for Vice President based on the fact she has five children?"
Here are the Parent Posse's responses, and feel free to chime in with your own by using the Talkback feature.
I think it is great! Who says we can't have it all! I am amazed she is going to tackle all of this, but kudos for her for showing others you can balance work and family, with the right support in place. Not to sound cliché, "You go, girl!"
Mary Jo Preston
Menomonee Falls
I'm just not a big fan of the "you can have it all" mentality of parenting and career. Even if dad at this point becomes the "stay at home parent," five kids is a lot to deal with, especially with a young special needs child. I am much more of a "parent first, career second" type of person, but that is me. I just feel the kids will lose out in this situation. It is her family, and her life, so I'm not going to make a judgment on that. I just know I would not do it.
Rick Stieghorst
Brookfield
I know how guilty I feel as a working mom with one child and I barely ever travel! On the other hand, I think it's great for society that women are being considered for the highest governmental offices in the U.S. I think most agree that women can be good mothers, partners and homemakers while they work full-time. I assume Gov. Palin will use her resources to make sure her children receive proper care and attention while she campaigns. Perhaps that will mean a less-than-perfect situation. Perhaps that will mean her children will lose the security and schedule of being home regularly. Perhaps she'll have to lean on her husband, family, friends and even hired help. But, I'm sure she'll make it work as so many other working mothers do.
Robin Mindt
West Allis
I wouldn't say crazy. Can I say both admirable and not admirable at the same time? Because I'm going to. It's admirable because any woman who is able to pursue their professional aspirations AND be a mother is a superwoman. It's quite the juggling act no matter who you are. Also, she may be running for the vice presidency and certainly that brings with it pressures that the rest of us don't face. However, such a high level position also brings with it certain privileges that the rest of us don't have access to. I'm thinking cooks, housekeepers, private schools, Secret (Service) security, etc.
Elizabeth Moen
Bay View
This is a hard issue because women should definitely be present in government and hold public office. Women that work full-time (including myself) struggle daily to balance careers and family, and I don't know any that feel they are doing their best at both all the time.
Considering the ages of her children, I do think that it's pretty crazy for her to be running for Vice President. In my opinion, family always comes first and while it's admirable for her to try and juggle all these responsibilities, I still wouldn't do it.
With a special needs newborn and three children in school, I think her children need as much care and attention as possible. Her oldest daughter, Bristol, is pregnant and needs support (that only a mother can give) through the pregnancy. Bristol is most certainly going through a very difficult time and needs reassurance, guidance, comfort, love and advice from her mother daily. I don't think that her mother can do that over the phone while on the campaign trail.
Melissa Tempel
Riverwest
I think that its neither a bad idea nor admirable that Sarah Palin is running for Vice President from a parenting standpoint. Its simply the choice she made. Its a double standard to assume that the mother or a woman needs to be the primary caregiver for her children.
There are many ways to parent. I'm not into judging women who work or their parenting ability/style. Personally I'd like to learn from moms who do make their choices work. If she was a man, there would be no question like this in any media.
It's a silly question for a male. It is a silly question for a female also people!) I admire Ms. Palin's husband for being supportive, thus helping her realize her political dreams because I have to guess there is good teamwork in their marriage.
I also admire Michelle Obama for being supportive, thus helping her husband realize his political dreams and would guess there is good teamwork in their marriage too. Same thing.
Carol Voss
Bay View
What is most important to me in this scenario is that people ask themselves the same questions that they would ask if it were a man running for office. As a parent, mother or father, I think it would take a very organized person who is fully supported by their partner and has a lot of help from outside the home, to succeed in any highly demanding career. If a person ends up giving all the time that they should to a role such as Vice President, and even running the campaign prior to the election.
I am afraid that that person couldn't possibly be able to spend the amount of time that they would want to with their children. Running a Vice Presidential campaign, and possibly being VP, would require travel, long hours and more than likely a high level of stress. I personally don't know how anyone could do that successfully and still be an active parent that is truly engaged in the lives of their children.
Kate Borders
East Side
|
10 comments about this article. Post a comment / write a review. |
Posted by diesel1976 on Sept. 10, 2008 at 8:28 a.m. (report)
Personally I think she was the wrong choice for VP. It is clear all McCain cares about is getting more votes and not the safety of our country. Its a very scary thought to know that if Mc Cain wins and something happens to him that this women would be our president. Its enough to give anyone nightmares. The fact that she is a mother and has 5 children isnt the bad thing. The fact that she is an extremist and a puppet of the republican party. Is she the most qualified women or man that they could have picked? The answer is NO. Then you have to ask yourself why was she picked? She definately wasnt picked because they thought she would be a good replacement for McCain.
| Rate this: |
Posted by mitchgat on Sept. 9, 2008 at 10:14 a.m. (report)
The first thing that would be helpful is if people would stop using labels. Labels are sometimes necessary, I get that. But who cares if youre a conservative or liberal? Who cares if your Dem or Reep? The sooner we all realize that our similarities as human beings, outweigh all the differences the labels we attach to ourselves and others, the sooner well all be able to get down to the real work of getting along as people and recognizing the common interest we have in working together to solve our issues. The question on this blog was simple and my answer reflected that. However the real issue I have has little to do with Palin as a mother, and more to do with the party who supports specific beliefs and then, when convenient, ignores them. The Bible thumping, wait till you get married, Im more moral than you folks, jumped on the McCain\Palin bandwagon, in spite of the fact that Palins daughter had pre-marital sex. How quickly they can overlook the indiscretions of someone with whom they share a political affiliation and yet condemn the same actions of others who do the same thing. Thats real hypocrisy. Furthermore, McCain is running for President and since, as someone has already stated on this blog, the VPs job is a job with virtually no assigned duties, then why all the hoopla over a candidate who wont have much responsibility in the first place? Why defend her when, someone like me (who in the whole scheme doesnt matter) calls her parenting into question? I listened to both candidates over the past 7 months. I actually didnt watch the Democratic convention but I did watch the Republicans. I truly listened to McCain. My verdict: over the past 6 months, its obvious that hes flying by the seat of his pants. Not until last week during his acceptance speech did he offer any real glimpse of a plan to address the real issues facing all Americans, and even then, most of it was vague and surprisingly, it centered on the same word Obama chose 7 months ago. I also listened as he touted the same family values, blah, blah, blah that I hear every 4 years from those who consider themselves to be conservative. I guess what I find amazing is how people chose not to see how this US vs. THEM mentality (present on both sides of the political fence) is counter-productive to the CHANGE we really need! The funny thing about assigning labels and then adhering to them strictly is it backs a person into a corner. It places them on the defense all the time, as evidenced by the responses here. It leaves no room for middle ground, practical thinking. My way or the highway doesnt work, nor does professing that the Republican Party somehow has cornered the market on morality. Not! And by the way, I dont consider myself Reep or Dem. If I had to be labeled, I would be happy with middle of the road, as BOTH parties sides have perspectives that make perfect sense.
| Rate this: |
Posted by brewerfan13 on Sept. 9, 2008 at 9:25 a.m. (report)
This 'issue' bothers me more than anything. It's such an awful double standard. If Palin didn't have kids, people would complain that she's just a career-driven woman with no family values, how can she relate to American families, etc. But because she has five children, people question her ability to hold a position in office. Either way, she can't win! And I agree with what others have said below - no one questions a man with children holding a position in office. Come on people! It's 2008, not 1950.
| Rate this: |
Posted by mkelover on Sept. 8, 2008 at 10:44 p.m. (report)
Let's see, McCain has 7 kids, he's a Senator and his wife runs a major beer distributorship...Maybe McCain shouldn't run either? Oh and don't forget Barack Obama has 2 young children at home and his wife is a hospital administrator making 314k per year...maybe Barack, who makes FAR less as a US Senator, should stay at home with the young girls and take them to school everyday and not just photo-op days. The fact that people (mainly non-conservatives) are talking about this shows 1) their hypocrisy and 2) how good a pick Palin was if this is their anti-argument against her.
| Rate this: |
Posted by buck on Sept. 8, 2008 at 4:04 p.m. (report)
So are you people saying women should have to sign a commitment to not have any kids until they are done with public service? Or not be allowed to run until menopause? Or only sterile women be allowed to run? This is all crazy talk. What a double standard.
| Rate this: |
| Top Clicks | Top Searches | Most Talkbacks |