So, we're spammers, eh?
There's nothing like get nailed for having good intentions.
I got an e-mail the other day from a reader who was blocked from visiting OnMilwaukee.com because his corporate firewall used a product called siteadvisor.com to determine which sites are work-friendly. Apparently, siteadvisor.com, a McAfee product, has deemed OnMilwaukee.com as "somewhat spammy."
Awhile ago our "e-mail this to a friend" feature had a bug in it. This bug would randomly cause some people to get many identical e-mails over and over. It was a tough bug to fix but we eventually re-wrote the whole system to take care of it.
Unfortunately, there's no way to change that rating on siteadvisor.com. There's a link for the owner of the site to leave a comment defending his or her Web site, but that doesn't resolve the problem. It also doesn't update the rating once the problem was rectified (in our case, months ago).
Quite literally, this Web site is interfering with our business operations, since we rely on visitors to drive page views that display ads. If it's not illegal, it's certainly unethical to brand us like this. We don't serve funky cookies, we don't display third-party pop-ups or pop-unders anymore, and most importantly, we NEVER send spam.
That's not to say we don't send e-mail to our nearly 38,000 registered users. But they must double opt in for newsletters like the Weekend Preview, Daily Digest, Sports Digest, Movie Newsletter, Movie Update and Kids & Family Roundup. They opt out with a single click of "unsubscribe" at the bottom of every newsletter. This couldn't be anything farther from spam.
But apparently, it took just one surly user, "GrandpaShaggy," to make us "somewhat spammy." Gramps, apparently, has posted 46 other ratings on Web sites, from porn sites to MSN. He seems to be a bit of a conspiracy theorist, or at the very least not very Web-savvy, for if he thinks we "ettempted [sic] to place 99 cookies" on his machine, he's just plain wrong.
What can you do? Post your own comment at this disturbing Web site, letting other users know that we're not spammers -- we're just trying to tell great Milwaukee stories to our 1.2 million monthly readers.
If you like getting the Weekend Preview and our other great free offerings, please do chime in. Because if siteadvisor gets its way, you may find yourself blocked from OnMilwaukee.com in the future.
As always, thanks for your support.
I have seen sites with worse ads than yours get rated green from SiteAdvisor. I am considering getting a siteadvisor reviewer account then going to their website and rating them bad.
I still run siteadvisor in one browser but I now pay very little attention to its yellow and even red ratings. Many times I post a good rating for good website where I find siteadvisor has mis-categorized it with a yellow or red rating. That is pretty much the only reason I keep sideadvisor running at all and I certainly know better now than to buy any of that company's other web or computer security products. I just went over to the other browser and left a good comment at SideAdvisor for On Milwaukee...to ad to several others ahead of mine.
Many sites are rated incorrectly by siteadvisor. Sometimes the problem seems to be receiving emails after signing up for emails. Sometimes I see a notation that popups occured or malware was added where this is simply not the case and nothing like happens at the site or at the most there is one popup and only the cookies needed for cookie-based functions to run.
Maybe a reviewer clicked through an ad on the site in question and had a negative experience on a different site (at the other end of the ad) and blamed the first site. Or maybe the reviewer's computer was already malware infested so every site seems to serve pernicious popups. I don't know either how siteadvisor gets away with continuing to damage the reputation of so many website owners, even non-profit website owners who simply offer the chance for visitors to sign up for an email list
I spent a day following up on SiteAdvisor after I caught on to its tricks and found its ratings are wildly inconsistent. After investigating sites I came across in search results marked yellow and red I have not found one yet that is deserving of being marked down this way. And it is true that at first I always (needlessly) avoided search results showing anything other than green! Of course I am referring to an array topics where only a small percentage of websites are likely to be ill intentioned - I don't search for adults-only material or gambling or cheap this or that.
Anyway I am happy to see someone else has noticed that SiteAdvisor is part of the problem(s) - aroundcomputer and website security and safety - rather than any effective solution.
Your website used to have online ads that that opened up if you accidentally scrolled over them and pop-up and pop-under ads all a little sneaky. Things have improved recently, but you really need to make sure you dont have any ads that appear to be Windows error messages telling you your computer needs to be optimized, or that you are the one-millionth visitor and will win something.
3 comments about this article.
Post your comment/review now
Disclaimer: Please note that Facebook comments are posted through Facebook and cannot be approved, edited or declined by OnMilwaukee.com. The opinions expressed in Facebook comments do not necessarily reflect those of OnMilwaukee.com or its staff.
Recent Articles & Blogs by Andy Tarnoff
Published June 28, 2016
In college, I had a reoccurring nightmare that I was trapped on a crazy elevator. Lately, that's been replaced by what I call the "fat finger" dream. I've talked to a few people, including co-worker Molly Synder, who has had it, too.
Published June 27, 2016
OnMilwaukee publisher Andy Tarnoff is very impressed with this year's Summerfest lineup, but he thinks the strongest day for the Big Gig is on July 9. For his money, he's especially excited about Howard Jones and, obviously, Sir Paul McCartney. Here are his picks.
Published June 11, 2016
"It's good to be king." Mel Brooks actually said that, quoting himself, to a sold-out show Saturday night at the Riverside. Based on the remarkable stories, the adoring reception and the super-human energy from this soon-to-be 90-year-old film legend, I believe him.
Published May 7, 2016
I won't lie to you: I know nothing about the current state of professional wrestling. But from 1983 to 1989, from about age 9 to 15, I was a huge fan. So big, in fact, that I wrote a fan letter to WWF announcer "Mean" Gene Okerlund.
Published April 28, 2016
Angry readers, self-righteous writers and surly social media speculators are in a tizzy about an uptick in "clickbait," and in many respects, they have every right to be. In lots of cases, it's a bogus attempt to lure gullible readers, and ultimately, it won't and doesn't work.
Published April 25, 2016
I've known about Mel Brooks' upcoming June 11 visit to Milwaukee for a little while now. Make no mistake, this is a "bucket list" show for me: Brooks is one of my all-time favorites in Hollywood, and "Blazing Saddles" has sat atop my favorite movie list forever.
Published April 15, 2016
For the many dozens of times I've visited the historic Pfister Hotel - for meetings, meals, weddings and drinks - until prepping for OnMilwaukee Hotel Week, I never spent an overnight at this Victorian masterpiece. Cross that off my bucket list - and I didn't even have to meet a ghost to do it.
Published April 14, 2016
As today's the wonderfully-made up "414 Day," or "Milwaukee Day," depending on who you talk to - it's a sexy day to look back at this excellent video from 2014 by the Five Card Studs.
Published April 11, 2016
I've been binge-watching HBO's "Vinyl." During a scene at an L.A. beach party, the camera panned to a sideburned record executive, smoking a joint and talking about Elvis. Even 25 years since I saw him last, I knew immediately that was my friend from high school, Dave Shalansky. I'd recognize that guy anywhere.
Published April 4, 2016
I'm sitting here on Opening Day, in the first row of the press box at Miller Park, and it's quiet. Too quiet. I mean, I can hear the fans in the ventilation over the sound of stands in this not-sold-out stadium. Apparently, other people here are either rolling their eyes in the fifth inning (or they're passed out).