Advertise on OnMilwaukee.com
Nearly all second graders in MPS took the Cognitive Abilities Test this school year. Fifty-three of them turned out to be Mensa material.
Nearly all second graders in MPS took the Cognitive Abilities Test this school year. Fifty-three of them turned out to be Mensa material. (Photo: Milwaukee Public Schools)

What's a CogAT? Your second grader knows

The push back against testing in schools is all over the news lately, with protests across the country by parents and educators who believe schools are spending way too much time not only testing, but prepping for tests, to the exclusion of all subjects other than the few that are tested.

Among the tests kids take at MPS are three rounds of computerized MAP (Measures of Academic Progress) testing, which is given soon after the school year begins to benchmark kids' abilities and again in winter and spring to map progress.

Starting at third grade (through eighth, and then again in 10th), there is the state test, which until this year has been the WKCE (Wisconsin Knowledge and Concepts Examinations). That will be replaced next year with online Smarter Balanced Testing. These are the tests the Feds look at to rate what it deems to be progress.

This year, nearly all second graders in the district took a Cognitive Abilities Test, dubbed CogAT, that was mandated to ensure that kids at the highest levels are receiving a sufficiently challenging education.

Here is what an MPS Power Point says of the CogAT:

CogAT is a norm referenced assessment that measures "learned reasoning abilities"

  • Verbal Battery: assesses ability to use search, retrieval and comparison processes
  • Quantitative Battery: assesses ability to reason about patterns and relationships
  • Non Verbal Battery: assesses ability to reason with novel questions that use spatial and figural content

Let's be honest, it's basically an IQ test, even if it's not called that or scored the same way.

Just under 6,000 kids at 109 of MPS' 110 elementary schools took part in the testing (103 using paper and pencil and six online). I wonder not only which school was exempted – and why – but if kids in other gifted and talented programs, like the one at Victory School, for example, were tested.

And why kids at schools like the seven Montessoris, which already differentiate for all kids, had to take it is unclear.

The district got the results of the tests on Feb. 14, and schools got them a couple weeks ago, and are sharing them with families. Over spring break, some parents – the ones whose kids scored highest – began to get letters at home from Central Services with their kids' results.

The results, by the way, showed that 53 MPS second graders qualify for Mensa. Of those kids, 28.3 percent have an IEP and/or qualify for free or reduced lunch.

Overall, 52.3 percent of kids testing in the "average" range, 27.4 in the "below average" stanines and 13 percent were "above average."

According to a district Power Point last month, "principals, APs and instructional coaches were trained on how to read their CogAT data and plan for GT interventions (and) instructional coaches or principals will hold second and third grade level meetings to discuss data and plan educational opportunities for GT students by mid-March."

Next year, the students identified as gifted and talented by the test, as well as by MAP scores and teacher observations, "will be flagged in the new student identification system" for the upcoming school year and, apparently, in subsequent grades.

I'm curious, what are your thoughts on the CogAT testing? Do you think it will serve its intended purpose?

Is that purpose worth adding another test to the regimen of three MAP tests, WKCE, etc.?

Is the CogAT measuring what is already sufficiently measured via MAP tests?

Has your school sent home results yet? How were the scores communicated?

Has there been push back from families and school staff?

Should kids know the results? Will kids discuss their results among themselves? (Of course they will. On MAP testing days, the kids come home knowing not only their own results but the results of all their friends, regardless of whether or not they understand the scoring system.)

Share using the talkback feature below, comment on Facebook or send me an email.

Talkbacks

Post your comment/review now No Talkbacks for this article.
Post your comment/review now

Facebook comments

Disclaimer: Please note that Facebook comments are posted through Facebook and cannot be approved, edited or declined by OnMilwaukee.com. The opinions expressed in Facebook comments do not necessarily reflect those of OnMilwaukee.com or its staff.