When the sirens sounded Wednesday night in Waukesha, most who heard them assumed a tornado warning had been issued. Residents of Muskego and Kenosha heard similar sirens and also assumed that a tornado was threatening.
It turns out the sirens were sounded in those communities (and others) because of the potential for destructive, non-tornado winds.
But wait, you say, they are "tornado sirens." Aren't they supposed to be used for tornadoes only?
I'm told that many local communities reserve the right to sound their sirens for any situation that may be considered a serious threat to public safety. In the case of Wednesday night, the National Weather Service was warning about the potential for winds over 100 miles per hour. Winds of that strength are strong enough to do major to damage to homes, power lines, trees, etc. In my estimation, 100 mph winds do qualify as a serious threat to public safety.
But wait, you say, if the winds are going to be over 100 mph, there has to be a tornado, right?
When certain atmospheric conditions are in place, wind speeds can hit triple digits without the presence of a tornado. We call these "straight-line" winds, as opposed to the rotating winds of a tornado. This type of situation isn't common, but it does happen more often than you might think.
And here's the kicker: What many don't realize is that a large percentage of tornadoes barely get much over 100 mph.
So, in the case of Wednesday night, we had a situation where the potential for damage was about equal to that in most tornado situations. Therefore, officials in many communities determined that the situation was serious enough to sound their warning sirens.
Some communities remained silent. Some may not have deemed the potential for 100-plus mph winds siren-worthy. Others may have a policy that they only hit the horn for official tornado warnings. There may have been other reasons as well.
Whatever the case, there was confusion around why the sirens were going off in some places and not others, as well as why they were going off at all.
The bottom line, I guess, is that when you hear warning sirens, dangerous conditions exist, whether there's a tornado or not.
How does this publication still exist? How do you find sponsors? The staff over at OMC writes about the most trivial subjects, which wouldn't be so bad if not for the terrible writing itself. I hope none of you are compensated for your contributions, because I constantly ask myself "what are they contributing?" Have you ever read a well written alternative publication like Vita.mn or Westword? They're heavy on civic boosterism (reviews of concerts, movies and restaurants, top 10 lists, etc) like OMC, but also feature actual journalism and investigative reporting not just the whimsical rantings of its staff members. People want real news, why not do an article that asks City Hall what is the state of the streetcar? Why not ask Kohl's where they plan on relocating instead of just speculating on it? How about getting to the bottom of why the M7 was silent on the subject of high speed rail during the gubernatorial campaign and what the repercussions of losing that money have meant for our state? Why did Herb Kohl build a basketball/hockey arena in Madison, but he can't build one in Milwaukee? Why doesn't one of Milwaukee's numerous other Fortune 500s like Northwestern Mutual or Harley-Davidson build a new arena? Same question can be said about expanding the convention center and why ManPower or Johnson Controls can't help pay for it? Why is Greater Milwaukee still the most segregated metropolitan area in the nation? There's plenty of news to be covered in this city and nobody is choosing to cover it.
1 comment about this article.
Post your comment/review now
Disclaimer: Please note that Facebook comments are posted through Facebook and cannot be approved, edited or declined by OnMilwaukee.com. The opinions expressed in Facebook comments do not necessarily reflect those of OnMilwaukee.com or its staff.
Recent Articles & Blogs by Craig Koplien
Published May 22, 2013
The Memorial Day weekend is in sight. How does it look?
Published May 21, 2013
There is a chance of thunderstorms on Tuesday, then a higher threat for rain on Wednesday.
Published May 20, 2013
We have a couple bumpy days ahead. Multiple rounds of thunderstorms are likely Monday through Tuesday night, each of which will have the potential to produce damaging winds and large hail.
Published May 10, 2013
Today's weather is ... pretty bad. But is it worse than it was on May 10, 1990?
Published May 7, 2013
Gorgeous weather continues Tuesday and Wednesday. Expect lots of sun, light winds, temps above normal (normal is mid 60s) and rain likely Thursday along with the start of a cooling trend.
Published May 6, 2013
It will be picture-perfect spring weather for the first few days this week, with a threat for rain coming late on Wednesday night and Thursday, then again on Saturday.
Published May 3, 2013
Indications which once pointed to a rainy weekend in Milwaukee have lately been trending the other way. Rain on Friday will gradually end Friday night. Saturday's threat for rain is rather low Sunday looks to be rain-free.
Published Jan. 23, 2013
The bitter cold of the last few days was apropos when considering historical average temperatures across southern Wisconsin. On average, the coldest week of the year in southern Wisconsin is roughly Jan 14-20. Beginning now, the average temperature begins its long, painfully slow climb upward. But it is upward! Feel free to consider winter halfway over.
Published Dec. 20, 2012
Today's storm will not have a major impact on the city of Milwaukee and adjacent communities. Yes, there will be snow. Plus, it will be brutally windy by Thursday afternoon and evening. But the snow accumulation and its on impact on travel in the city of Milwaukee will be nothing compared to what will happen in southwest, central and northeast Wisconsin.
Published Dec. 19, 2012
The snowstorm that has been talked about for several days will hit Wisconsin Wednesday night and continue through Thursday.