The media has spent the last few years doing a great job of redrawing the lines of bigotry. It used to be that action predicated bigotry. Today, simply having a religious belief that opposes gay marriage will brand you as a bigot. This subtle change is no mistake and has been effective in turning the conversation of bigotry from actions to beliefs.
Once the media could successfully target people for their beliefs, they were able to control the conversation. Controlling the conversation allowed them to ultimately target those individuals and groups that shared opposing views, while protecting those sympathetic to their viewpoints. If you look at some of the incidents from this summer, you can see the hypocrisy that has been allowed to develop.
Of course, who can forget Paula Deen and the backlash she suffered from past use of the hateful "N" word earlier this summer? The line of bigotry was redrawn from present day to a new standard of holding people responsible for past behavior, opinions, or comments. It’s too bad long time Democrat Sen. (and admitted KKK leader) Robert Byrd couldn’t live to see his years of minority oppression rewarded through this new media standard.
Deen was fired from her cooking show and lost nearly all of her sponsors. It was a harsh penalty indeed for views she admitted to having a long time ago. When did we start accepting media persecution of past, but reformed, beliefs?
Redrawing the line from present day opinions to being held accountable for past opinions would bring me to President Obama. Remember when the president was opposed to gay marriage?
Much like Deen, Obama was roundly chortled as a bigot and as a hateful person. Oh wait, he wasn’t. That’s right, he "evolved." Something tells me that if Deen crept onto "The Today Show" and told everyone she suddenly evolved, no one would be buying it. What’s the difference between Deen and Obama’s past bigotry, as redefined by the media?
Another classic example of this inconsistent treatment would be everyone’s favorite race baiter, Rev. Al Sharpton. Much like Deen, Sharpton also has some past hateful comments to his credit. This one in particular caught my eye from a speech in 1994:
"White folks was [sic] in caves while we was building empires ... We taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it."
Read those comments again. So Sharpton can make bigoted comments in the past about homosexuality and keep his TV show without reprisal, yet Deen does the exact same thing and she suffers media scorn? I wonder what could be different between Sharpton and Deen’s past bigotry, as redefined by the media. All three media figures committed past bigotry by today’s redrawn standards, yet only one of them suffered a loss of employment or income?
These three examples expose the fundamental flaw in this new media dynamic. If the media was truly interested in ending bigotry, each offender would be treated the same. Instead, each is treated differently, based upon their political beliefs.
By reshaping the conversation to be about beliefs, rather than actions, the media has successfully been able to persecute those that share opposing views. While America bleats away in the pasture, the media continues to successfully erase and redraw the lines of bigotry.
John, the media's doing God's work, take their willingness to not write about the difficulties of proving rape in even the most open socities in the Middle East. There are no gay pride marches in Iran. The media will not report on the burning of Chriatian churches in Syria, yet in Ameica we have thousands of Mosques where Muslims go to pray every day unmolested by our citizens. The media as a capitalistic business model is dead unless you provide both points of view fairly.
1 comment about this article.
Post your comment/review now
Disclaimer: Please note that Facebook comments are posted through Facebook and cannot be approved, edited or declined by OnMilwaukee.com. The opinions expressed in Facebook comments do not necessarily reflect those of OnMilwaukee.com or its staff.
Recent Articles & Blogs by John Mumper
Published Nov. 15, 2013
I'd like to first start by thanking you for your investment in Milwaukee baseball. I'm old enough to remember the glory days, as well as the dry spell that came afterwards. As a diehard baseball fan, I appreciate all you have done to return Brewers baseball to respectability. It's with the goal of keeping the Brewers relevant in the long term that I write this letter.
Published Nov. 3, 2013
I was intrigued for several reasons by the recent comments from Democratic candidate for governor, Mary Burke. Most surprising was her courage in finally taking a stance on any topic related to Wisconsin politics. However, it was her comments about education, and her trust in mother government, that got my attention.
Published Oct. 18, 2013
I must make a confession. At the risk of being labeled a RINO, I need to express my support for universal health care. Before being trashed by my fellow fiscal conservatives and being hailed by hapless progressives, let me explain.
Published Oct. 9, 2013
The Boston bombing incident highlighted a new and disturbing trend in America. As the Boston police searched for the remaining suspect, they proceeded to enter homes in a forceful and right-seizing manner. While many residents willingly allowed heavily armed police to enter their home in the frantic search, others weren't allowed their constitutional rights.
Published July 12, 2013
A recent Journal Sentinel watchdog article highlighted one of the many problems with how residents qualify for financial assistance. This article revealed how landlords and the self employed can receive state aid based on the honor system. In essence, we're talking about receiving thousands of tax payer dollars without being verified that economic assistance is even needed.
Published June 26, 2013
Recently, Madison Mayor Paul Soglin presented an idea that caught my attention. In a nutshell, he wants to require city contractors to disclose money contributed to political groups. The result would be that the mayor could then cherry pick which groups the city works with based upon political ideologies and not who is the best company for the job.
Published June 13, 2013
The Edward Snowden case is a fascinating look at the changing political climate in America. People who base their political outlooks on the Constitution are up in arms. The outrageous invasion of privacy is nothing new but is, all the same, alarming. I cannot support any policy that allows the government to freely spy on Americans not suspected of a crime.
Published June 6, 2013
Tuesday marked my one-year anniversary as a vegetarian. I successfully went an entire year cutting out meat and fish from my diet. Since I'm not crazy, I allowed myself the luxury of dairy products. In all honesty, it was a difficult transition.
Published May 29, 2013
At first, it seemed people that didn't trust the government lived in isolated rural outposts and were survivalists hell bent on avoiding taxes. There was a certain stigma attached to being a government dissenter. Alas, images of tin foil hats and mysterious black helicopters are easy to envision.
Published May 17, 2013
I love Milwaukee. As a kid living in rural communities, I couldn't wait to one day move to the big city. Summer festivals, Brewers games and Lake Michigan seemed to call my name at an early age. After graduating from college, there was little doubt where I would end up starting a life. That being said, the realities of living in the big city drew a stark comparison to the expectations I had built up in my own mind.