Sign in | Register now | Like us on FacebookLike Us | Follow us on TwitterFollow Us

Milwaukee's Daily Magazine for Saturday, Nov. 1, 2014

Hi: 41
Lo: 30
Hi: 47
Lo: 29

Lo: 38
Advertise on

Readers Blog

What Tree is This?

Is the 30-foot tall evergreen  tree in the Wisconsin Capitol Rotunda really a Christmas Tree?  Since 1985 trees like it have been officially referred to as "holiday trees", a euphemism designed to obfuscate the  obvious Christian symbolism of the tree. But now Gov. Scott Walker has  accurately labeled the  "tannenbaum" as a Christmas tree;  Annie Laurie Gaylor, president of the Freedom from Religion Foundation, castigated  Walker's  choice of words as ".... a slight and snub to non-Christians."  (1)  Is she  right?

The earliest documented use of the Christmas tree was in Estonia in 1441.  The custom spread to northern Germany over the next hundred years and to England about  1800.  (Wikipedia)  Since no other religion widely practiced in the United States uses a decorated tree to celebrate a winter holiday,  such a tree  is clearly  a symbol of  Christmas and no other holiday.  Jews and other non-Christians  are not fooled by the ambiguous  "holiday tree" designation.

But then,  is it  legal to display a Christmas tree on government property?   In 1988 the city-county building in Pittsburgh displayed a 45-foot high Christmas tree alongside an 18-foot high Lubavitch Chanukah  Menorah.   The display was challenged in court as  an endorsement of religion by local government.   On July 3, 1989, the US Supreme Court ruled  6-3  that  since the display included symbols of two different religions, the county  was not endorsing any one religion, and therefore the display did not violate the  Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. (2)   Since about 1980  a  similar  Menorah has also been displayed in the Wisconsin State Capitol, and a sign by the Freedom from Religion Foundation  denouncing all religions as "superstitions" has also been permitted.  So Wisconsin's  display  would be on safe constitutional ground.  I would personally prefer no religious symbols on government property at all, but will settle for the  multi-faith (and no faith) display.

While I believe that Scott Walker  intended to bond with fellow Christians  (the vast majority of Wisconsin voters)  by denoting the tree as a Christmas  tree, I  doubt that it was  ever intended as  "slight" or "snub"  to non-Christians, as Gaylor claimed.   Walker has never shown such a tendency, and there is no  political incentive to do so now.

Devout Christians believe  in the "Second Coming" of Jesus.  If  J C were to return this year and celebrate his  2,011th birthday by touring the Wisconsin State Capitol,  the Christmas tree would mean nothing to him.  He would recognize  the cross, not as a symbol of faith, but as a symbol of Roman persecution and cruelty.  The only religious symbol  he would  recognize in the Capitol would be the Lubavitch Chanukah Menorah, and he would not call   it a  "Winter Candelabra."

Gerald S Glazer


(1) Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Nov. 8, 2011, page 2B.

(2)  County of Allegheny vs ACLU,  492 US 573 (1989)

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this and other user-submitted content do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of, its staff, its advertisers and/or its partners. This user-submitted content has not been checked for factual accuracy, and any photos uploaded have not be verified to be copyright-free. It is the user's responsibility to post text and/or photos that belong to that user and do not violate any copyright or intellectual property laws. If you feel this content is abusive, offensive or otherwise inappropriate, click to report and we will review this blog entry.

Rate this:
  • Average rating: 0.0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


solitarius | Nov. 9, 2011 at 10:13 a.m. (report)

Great post, thanks

Rate this:
  • Average rating: 0.0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post your comment/review now 1 comment about this blog.
Post your comment/review now

Facebook comments

Disclaimer: Please note that Facebook comments are posted through Facebook and cannot be approved, edited or declined by The opinions expressed in Facebook comments do not necessarily reflect those of or its staff.