Sign in | Register now | Like us on FacebookLike Us | Follow us on TwitterFollow Us

Milwaukee's Daily Magazine for Sunday, May 19, 2013

Sun
Hi: 73
Lo: 58
Mon
Hi: 78
Lo: 60
Tue
Hi: 73
Lo: 57
Advertise on OnMilwaukee.com

Readers Blog

Democratic Debacle

With nearly 55% of the vote,  Republican Gov. Scott Walker has become the first governor in US history to survive a recall election. All four  Republican state senators targeted for recall also retained their seats June 5.   The Democratic Party of Wisconsin, which won the governorship in 2002 and 2006, and the presidential vote in 2004 and 2008,  suffered a humiliating defeat.  How could they go so wrong?

1. Recalls.  Although the Wisconsin Constitution does not specify any particular grounds for recalling an elected official,  there is widespread sentiment that the tactic should only be used to oust crooks.  After trying to recall six Republican state senators in 2011 (two of whom lost), the Dems have gone recall-mad in seeking to remove  the Governor, Lieutenant Governor and another four state senators on June 5.  Apparently, most voters  felt that the recall weapon should only be used for cases of  truly reprehensible misconduct, not policy differences.

2. Union Power.When Wisconsin granted public employees collective bargaining rights in 1959,  union membership and power were at their peak.  Today, the biggest union in the state is not UAW, but  WEAC, and relatively few private-sector employees  belong to a union.  The impressive gains made by public employee unions have been at the expense of taxpayers, not  stockholders, and the Republicans have correctly perceived that  these unions could be used as a scapegoat for  the state's fiscal problems with impunity.

3. Timing. The best chance to recall Gov. Walker and the others would have been at the November general  election, but the anti-Walker forces just could not wait.  The colleges were all closed for the summer, and the findings of the John Doe investigation into Walker's administration as Milwaukee County Executive  have not been completed.  The timing was not strategic, but impulsive.

4. The contender. Tom Barrett, who  had already lost two races for Governor (in 2002 and 2010) was the strongest candidate to run, but not the strongest possible candidate.  Russ Feingold, Herb Kohl and  David Obey all would have done better than Barrett, but probably could not have won either.  The difference was that they were too smart to try.

5. The Jobs Issue. Tom Barrett made the claim that Wisconsin lost jobs under Walker a major issue. When it turned out that the state had actually gained about  33,000 jobs during that period,  he was flummoxed.  Actually, the gain could have been attributed to  President Obama's  successful stimulus program, but Walker claimed all the credit for himself. Although Walker had backed and signed plenty of crummy bills, Barrett unwisely chose to dwell on  an issue that Walker was able to turn to his advantage.

The Future

The failure of these recalls means that the Republicans will hold the governorship  through 2014, even if  Walker leaves  as a result of John Doe charges.  Recalls have been proven ineffective,  and they won't  be used much any time soon.

Tom Barrett is probably through as a candidate for statewide office, though he could be Mayor of Milwaukee as long as he lives.

Mahlon Mitchell, who was little-known until this campaign, has established himself as a serious  Democratic  candidate by garnering about the same percentage of the vote as Barrett in his race for Lieutenant Governor.   This is a man to  watch!

Gerald S Glazer

 

 

 

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this and other user-submitted content do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of OnMilwaukee.com, its staff, its advertisers and/or its partners. This user-submitted content has not been checked for factual accuracy, and any photos uploaded have not be verified to be copyright-free. It is the user's responsibility to post text and/or photos that belong to that user and do not violate any copyright or intellectual property laws. If you feel this content is abusive, offensive or otherwise inappropriate, click to report and we will review this blog entry.

Rate this:
  • Average rating: 0.0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Talkbacks

solitarius | June 6, 2012 at 11:01 a.m. (report)

It is very interesting that Mr Glazer lists no issues in his discussion as if election results are due to other considerations.
Walker won for the very same reason every politician wins every race, because the people favored his political positions and decisions.
Walker won because
1. He eliminated a 3.5 billion deficit
2. He saved jobs by reducing expenses of some government workers having them pay for a certain percentage of their benefits just like every other worker for private companieds do. That is, he removed the special provisions that government workers got that private workers do not get. That is, he introduced fairness into the employment situation in Wisconsin. However, the government workers still get better benefits than the average worker for private companies and better than teachers who work for private companies.
3. He lowered unemployment and added over 30,000 jobs.
4. Barrett proposed no policies at all. He simply resorted to character assasination of Walker.

Mr Glazer writes that Mahlon Mitchell has a future because he got as many votes as Barrett. How could he have gotten any less, there were only two choices. Donald Duck would have gotten as many votes as Barrett.

Democracy is alive and well in Wisconsin and the people have spoken.

Rate this:
  • Average rating: 0.0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post your comment/review now 1 comment about this blog.
Post your comment/review now

Facebook comments

Disclaimer: Please note that Facebook comments are posted through Facebook and cannot be approved, edited or declined by OnMilwaukee.com. The opinions expressed in Facebook comments do not necessarily reflect those of OnMilwaukee.com or its staff.