Sign in | Register now | Like us on FacebookLike Us | Follow us on TwitterFollow Us

Milwaukee's Daily Magazine for Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Wed
Hi: 65
Lo: 47
Thu
Hi: 56
Lo: 40
Fri
Hi: 58
Lo: 43
Advertise on OnMilwaukee.com

Readers Blog

The Rosenthal Risk

The Milwaukee Jewish Federation   (MJF) announced today that it has hired Hannah Rosenthal, now   US Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism, as its new president.  She has previously served as Midwest Regional Director of the  US Department of Health and Human Servcies (under President Bill Clinton) and Executive Director of the  Jewish Council for Public Affairs. (1)

Like most Jewish Americans, Hannah Rosenthal is a liberal Democrat.  But unlike the vast majority of them, she is also affiliated with  J Street, a Jewish lobby for a "two-state solution" to the Israel-Palestinian conflict.  J Street is strongly opposed to Jewish settlement in the West Bank area, seized from  Jordan in the 1967 Six Day War, upon which Arabs  seek to establish their State of Palestine.  Since its inception, J Street has been trying to pressure the US  government into pressuring Israel to stop the settlements and negotiate the establishment of the Palestinian state.  This policy puts J Street  at odds with Zionist lobbies, such as the American Israel Public Affairs Committee  (AIPAC) and the Zionist Organization of America  (ZOA), which advocate unconditional support for Israel.   President Barack Obama generally supports the J Street agenda, but  he has not used the leverage of  US aid to Israel (about $3 billion per year) to secure  any concessions.  

Research veteranarian Dr Ivan Lang has been circulating a petition on the Internet against hiring Rosenthal, primarily due to her J Street connection, and at least 60 people have already signed it.  I declined to sign or otherwise support this effort and here is why:

The MJF is mainly a fund-raising  entity for Jewish charities, and  I believe that Hannah Rosenthal will be an effective fund-raiser,  due to her  extensive connections in the political world.  MJF needs new sources of  support,  including  people and  foundations outside the Jewish community;  I think she will succeed in tapping these resources.  Success in fund-raising is easy to measure, so if she fails to increase  the amount raised (now about $7 million per year), she should leave.  I realize that some Jews who are miffed at Rosenthal's  J Street connection will protest by refusing to contribute to the MJF, but  some of these  will  still make direct donations  to the agencies that MJF supports,  such as the Jewish Museum, the Coalition for Jewish Learning and the Israel Center.  

However, the President of MJF  is also viewed as the spokesperson for Milwaukee's Jewish community by the media and leading politicians.  I hope that leaders of the MJF emphasize to their new President that  anything she says publicly about Israel and the Middle East may considered as  the views of the MJF and the broader Jewish community, so she must not use her office to advance her personal opinions.  Only the Jewish Community Relations Council (JCRC),an agency of MJF  which represents synagogues and Jewish organizations, has the right to determine policy questions, not the paid staff. As a member of JCRC, I intend to monitor her public statements closely, and urge JCRC to speak out if she veers off our message,

It is also essential that groups outside the ambit of MJF, such as AIPAC,  continue to  express independent views,  so that the public will understand that no one person or organization can speak for all Milwaukee Jewry.

Gerald S Glazer 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(1 )Jewish Federation taps leader, in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, July 19, 2012, page 2B. 

 

 

 

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this and other user-submitted content do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of OnMilwaukee.com, its staff, its advertisers and/or its partners. This user-submitted content has not been checked for factual accuracy, and any photos uploaded have not be verified to be copyright-free. It is the user's responsibility to post text and/or photos that belong to that user and do not violate any copyright or intellectual property laws. If you feel this content is abusive, offensive or otherwise inappropriate, click to report and we will review this blog entry.

Rate this:
  • Average rating: 0.0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Talkbacks

MilwaukeeCity | July 19, 2012 at 7:56 p.m. (report)

34661 Bad choice! a liberal Jew that does not stand with Israel.

Rate this:
  • Average rating: 0.0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

solitarius | July 19, 2012 at 12:19 p.m. (report)

It all sounds like hope and change to me and we all know how that works out. I prefer actually basing decisions on the data.

So how much has Rosenthal raised for other agencies during her tenure and how much more (% increase) compared to others for those organizations? If this decision had been on fund raising ability, then this data should be readily available. So what was it? If there is no such data, then this decision cannot possibly be about fund raising abilities.

Neither the Milwaukee Federation nor Mr Glazer have listed the evidence, i.e. fund raising data, for Rosenthal's abilities in this measurable variable, therefore, this decision must be about hope and change not fund raising abilities.

Rate this:
  • Average rating: 1.0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post your comment/review now 2 comments about this blog.
Post your comment/review now

Facebook comments

Disclaimer: Please note that Facebook comments are posted through Facebook and cannot be approved, edited or declined by OnMilwaukee.com. The opinions expressed in Facebook comments do not necessarily reflect those of OnMilwaukee.com or its staff.