![]() |
Louisiana Rep. Charles Boustany delivered the Republican response to Obama's speech. |
| By OnMilwaukee.com Staff Writers |
| Published Sept. 9, 2009 at 11:17 p.m. |
|
Louisiana Rep. Charles Boustany delivered the Republican response to President Obama's speech on health care. Here is the full text of Boustany's rebuttal:
Good evening. I'm Dr. Charles Boustany, and I'm proud to serve the people of Louisiana's Seventh Congressional District. I'm also a heart surgeon with more than 20 years of experience, during which I saw first-hand the need for lowering health care costs.
Republicans are pleased that President Obama came to the Capitol tonight. We agree much needs to be done to lower the cost of health care for all Americans. On that goal, Republicans are ready and we've been ready to work with the President for common-sense reforms that our nation can afford.
Afford is an important word. Our country is facing many challenges. The cost of health care is rising. Federal spending is soaring. We're piling huge debt on our children. And families and small businesses are struggling through a jobless recovery, with more than 2.4 million private-sector jobs lost since February.
It's clear the American people want health care reform, but they want their elected leaders to get it right. Most Americans wanted to hear the President tell Speaker Pelosi, Majority Leader Reid and the rest of Congress that it's time to start over on a common-sense, bipartisan plan focused on lowering the cost of health care while improving quality. That's what I heard over the past several months in talking to thousands of my constituents.
Replacing your family's current health care with government-run health care is not the answer. In fact, it'll make health care much more expensive. That's not just my personal diagnosis as a doctor or a Republican; it's the conclusion of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office the neutral scorekeeper that determines the cost of major bills.
I read the bill Democrats passed through committee in July. It creates 53 new government bureaucracies, adds hundreds of billions to our national debt, and raises taxes on job-creators by $600 billion. And, it cuts Medicare by $500 billion, while doing virtually nothing to make the program better for our seniors.
The President had a chance tonight to take government-run health care off the table. Unfortunately, he didn't do it.
We can do better, with a targeted approach that tackles the biggest problems. Here are four important areas where we can agree, right now:
One, all individuals should have access to coverage, regardless of preexisting conditions.
Two, individuals, small businesses and other groups should be able to join together to get health insurance at lower prices, the same way large businesses and labor unions do.
Three, we can provide assistance to those who still cannot access a doctor.
And, four, insurers should be able to offer incentives for wellness care and prevention something particularly important to me. I operated on too many people who could have avoided surgery if they'd simply made healthier choices earlier in life.
We do have ideas the President hasn't agreed with. We're grateful the President mentioned medical liability reform, and we hope he's serious. We need to establish tough liability reform standards, encourage speedy resolution of claims, and deter junk lawsuits that drive up the cost of care. Real reform must do this.
Let's also talk about letting families and businesses buy insurance across state lines. I and many other Republicans believe that that will provide real choice and competition to lower the cost of health insurance. Unfortunately, the President disagrees. You can read more about all these reforms at healthcare.gop.gov. These are common-sense reforms we can achieve right away without destroying jobs, exploding the deficit, rationing care, or taking away the freedom American families cherish.
This Congress can pass meaningful reform soon to reduce some of the fear and anxiety families are feeling in these very difficult times. Working together in a bipartisan way, we can truly lower the cost of health care while improving quality for the American people.
I'm Dr. Charles Boustany. Thanks for listening.
|
10 comments about this article. Post a comment / write a review. |
Posted by CoolerKing on Sept. 16, 2009 at 7:15 a.m. (report)
Dr. Boustany delivered that rebuttal quite well. However, there's nothing mentioned in regards to people that can't afford to buy insurance. Like the person whose employer has them on a 39 hour work week so they're considered "part time" and doesn't give them benefits. Aside from that, I'm totally for his vision of affordable insurance. Although I think government run healthcare is a little extreme at this point (I'd prefer a revamped insurance system), I will give an example of a government run healthcare system that has worked for years: The VA.
| Rate this: |
Posted by bloodyp on Sept. 10, 2009 at 7:39 p.m. (report)
Bueller? Bueller? Bueller?
| Rate this: |
Posted by cwhufsch on Sept. 10, 2009 at 2:06 p.m. (report)
So let me get this straight, the same people who have placed the Medicare Trust Fund within ten years of total bankruptcy and insolvency, now want you to think they can handle the entire health care system at all levels and all ages?
| Rate this: |
Posted by BrewCityAllstar on Sept. 10, 2009 at 10:03 a.m. (report)
The right... (and this is why I think this thing should be cut up and passed piece by piece) is open to talks (or at least this is what I'm hearing). The fact of the matter is that republicans have been (This is what I've heard) shut out of talks since April. This open-door policy that Obama was talking about last night is (supposedly) a fable. I could see this being true, though- he hasn't needed republican support on any other legislation, and has railroaded other legislation through, thus far- why would he try to craft bipartisan legislation is he doesn't have to?
| Rate this: |
Posted by MKE Luvva on Sept. 10, 2009 at 9:35 a.m. (report)
That was the point. People pay more to use UPS and FedEx, even though the government is in the mail game. It was an example of what you said people WON'T do. I suspect there are plenty of people who will pay more for higher end care. I'm not expecting the public option to be the kind of care most people aspire to and therefore I wouldn't think most people would ditch their current insurance for it. But it will be a great step up for people who currently have none. I don't understand why those with coverage are so interested in continuing to deny coverage to those who lack it. Regardless of what the fanatics who post here have to say about it. If the right is interested in reform, then come to the table and talk. They don't because they're hoping it will fail and they'll get back some of the ground they lost. It's a political game.
| Rate this: |
|
Summerfest to alter beer operation for 2010 Nov. 24, 2009 Major Goolsby's will no longer run the beer operation at the Summerfest grounds. Sources ... |
|
Nov. 21, 2009 Mason Jennings made a stop Friday night at Turner Hall Ballroom. |
|
Nov. 20, 2009 For Rock and Roll Hall of Fame singer John Fogerty, the world of music -- whether it be ... |
|
The Milwaukee Holiday Parade steps off Saturday Nov. 19, 2009 The Milwaukee Holiday Parade -- now in its 83rd year -- begins at 9:30 a.m. Saturday, ... |
|
Live Blog Recap: Bucks vs. New Jersey Nov. 18, 2009 The Bucks continued their winning ways tonight with a 99-85 victory over New Jersey Wednesday ... |
| Top Clicks | Top Searches | Most Talkbacks |