![]() | pshbrittx3: s i c k - I’ve been sitting home sick for the past five or six days. My days have consisted of this: waking... link about 47 minutes ago |
![]() | hilarydecent: Today's question. Can you develop flu symptoms 2 days after a flu shot or can you catch it from your sick daughter in England by phone? about 3 hours ago |
![]() | sdfarmgirl: @sbsbea Hope hubby is feeling better asap. Yep, no set hours or days with farming..no sick leave unless on death bed. SIGH about 3 hours ago |
![]() | ihatetelisha: me movinq sometime over the next few days or next weekend cant wait some say imma be home sick but i dont think so about 12 hours ago |
| MiScHeViOuSDIVA: @4EVAMJJ wats joe gonna do now. I found it sick wen he was promoting michael cd a couple days or something after his
Death about 15 hours ago |
![]() |
Will paid sick days help the overall health and productivity of the work force? |
| By Doug Hissom Special to OnMilwaukee.com E-mail author | Author bio More articles by Doug Hissom |
| Published Sept. 17, 2008 at 11:30 a.m. |
|
Gearing up for the November referendum on whether businesses should be mandated to provide sick leave, Milwaukee's 9to5 organization offers its own study.
The non-partisan, Washington, D.C.-based Institute for Women's Policy Research (IWPR) did a cost-benefit analysis of the proposed Milwaukee minimum paid sick days standard and found that the new standard will directly benefit more than 75,000 Milwaukee workers who currently lack paid sick days.
The report projects net savings to Milwaukee employers of $15 million per year, largely from reduced costs of turnover. The study estimates that Milwaukee workers will save $1 million per year in health care spending because of reduced spread of the flu at work. Nearly half (47 percent) of private sector workers have no paid sick days.
"Under the proposed standard, employers would enjoy greater productivity and healthier workplaces, while workers would benefit from having time to recover from illness or care for their sick children," said Vicky Lovell, IWPR's Acting Director of Research, who authored the report.
"It would also support public health by allowing sick workers to avoid contact with the public."
Perhaps washing hands isn't enough anymore.
"This proposal will help Milwaukeeans by reducing the spread of serious contagious diseases and protecting against job loss," said Amy Stear, Wisconsin Organizing Director for 9to5, which is leading an educational campaign on the policy initiative.
"This report shows that it's also a good policy for Milwaukee employers."
The proposal calls for workers to earn one hour of paid sick time for every 30 hours of paid work. Workers may use up to 72 hours of leave in a calendar year.
Small employers' needs are accommodated with a lower cap on leave (40 hours per year). Earned sick days could be used when workers are ill and for preventive care, care of sick family members and responding to domestic violence.
The cost-benefit report uses data collected by government agencies, including the Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the U.S. Department of Labor, as well as peer-reviewed research literature. It is part of a series of analyses conducted by IWPR about paid sick days policies. Funding for the study was provided by the Women's Fund of Greater Milwaukee, the Ford Foundation and the Annie E. Casey Foundation.
Free McGee? Give credit to the lawyer for former Ald. Michael McGee Jr. for trying to get some help for his client. In a letter to McGee's former colleagues, Victor Jackson, from the federal public defender's office, asked for a little support.
"I petition your sentiments of reflection and insight of our client, and your former colleague, Michael McGee, Jr. In the course of serving his constituents with zeal and tenacity, Mr. McGee found himself adrift of the goal. His political career has been extinguished, however, redemption is still quite possible. An unfortunate misstep, lack of sound judgment, or even criminal conviction, does not and should not necessarily define anyone's character.
"Mr. McGee is scheduled to be sentenced before the Honorable Judge Charles N. Clevert, Friday, October 24, 2008 at 10:30 a.m. in Room 222 of the Federal Courthouse (517 E. Wisconsin). If you elect to author a letter, please forward it to either myself or Mr. McGee's counsel: Attorney Calvin Malone. If you desire to respond in a manner not mentioned, please feel free to contact me.
"Thanking you in advance for your consideration."
No word yet on whether anyone has responded.
|
6 comments about this article. Post a comment / write a review. |
Posted by sinatra on Oct. 10, 2008 at 1:48 p.m. (report)
As someone with a young child, I would welcome the ability to take a couple extra days to take care of a sick child, rather than shoulder the cost of taking an unpaid day off or footing the cost of an unused day of daycare. But I can certainly see how some folks will take a "sick day" to shoot 18 holes, at the expense of their employer (who may also be out on the course...hmm, tough call.
| Rate this: |
Posted by bizguy on Sept. 17, 2008 at 3:53 p.m. (report)
Amazing, when you work in a position that offers no benefits the reaction should be to obtain more training or experience and try to move up the ladder to a better position. Instead everyone should just be given benefits whether they have earned them or not. Plain and simple this is a entitlement program that will be placed on the back of business owners. If Milwaukee keeps trying to kick around the few of us who employ people we will leave. Highlife guy..... You need to get a clue. or lay off the high life. I have 3 full time employees. I give them one week of paid vacation and 2 sick days. Your proposal would cause me to expend an additional 15,000 per year not to mention the additional staffing I would have to add to cover all of that time off. That is not feasable. The expense will just get passed along to the consumer, thus causing me to be less competitive in the marketplace, threatening the viability of my business. Not all of us live high on the hog on the backs of our employees.
| Rate this: |
Posted by High_Life_Man on Sept. 17, 2008 at 1:50 p.m. (report)
Another question is: Why are companies so opposed to vacation time? Really, would 4 weeks for all full-time employees be such a bad thing? Good for physical and mental health, family bonding and productivity. In the long term, vacation time really costs a company very little.
| Rate this: |
Posted by elnmajic on Sept. 17, 2008 at 1:23 p.m. (report)
I've already implemented paid sick leave for my employee's. I originally offered 3 weeks vacation + addition days based on seniority and up to 5 unpaid sick days, but instead cut everyone's vacation down to 1 week with 10 additional paid sick days which carry over as 1/2 vacation days if not used in the next year. It seems what my competitors are doing when confronted with this and I'm just following them. Unfortunately, my employees are not happy with this but the rest of my industry is doing the same so they accepted it. "Law of unintentional consequences"
| Rate this: |
Posted by bman on Sept. 17, 2008 at 12:38 p.m. (report)
It is excessive. It also puts businesses in Milwaukee at a competitve disadvantage against businesses in the suburbs. I own a business in Milwaukee. I will now be forced to provide a benefit to all of my part-time employees, including seasonal help. If I have a seasonal employee who works for me for 1 month at 30 hours per week I will owe them 4 hours. That is a joke. They will just leave 4 hours early on their last day and expect to be paid for it. The direct effect of this will be a trimming of the hours that these employees work. It's either that or raising prices. The sense of entitlement that Milwaukee has fostered is really beyond belief.
| Rate this: |
| Top Clicks | Top Searches | Most Talkbacks |