![]() | lukemcconnell1: So I just realized I've spent every night this semester with Tom or Barrett or both. Talk about inseparable. about 3 days ago |
| indyfilmwis: Join me LIVE on my Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett VS MPS and the pe show on #BlogTalkRadio at link or call (646) 727-2867 about 5 days ago |
![]() | TheMugRack: On Tom Barrett running for governor link. Does he want to win? or lose and quietly return to being mayor? about 9 days ago |
![]() |
Proponents and opponents of changing the way the Milwaukee Public Schools are run were lining up in droves this week. |
| By Doug Hissom Special to OnMilwaukee.com E-mail author | Author bio More articles by Doug Hissom |
| Published Aug. 28, 2009 at 11:14 a.m. |
|
Proponents and opponents of changing the way the Milwaukee Public Schools are run were lining up in droves this week as some public events were held to draw attention to a plan by Gov. Jim Doyle and Mayor Tom Barrett to allow the mayor to oversee the schools.
School Board members lined up behind the status quo, aldermen were divided and pols from the inner city backed MPS.
The mayor issued the most terse statement regarding one of the events held this week.
"To show up at an organized press event and summarily dismiss MPS governance reform without acknowledging our children's educational needs or the facts about MPS educational outcomes is either a sad sign of self interest or a deliberate attempt to run from the facts," he said.
"Milwaukee leads the nation in the racial achievement gap. We are at the bottom. We are behind Mississippi, Alabama and Detroit. Our high school dropout rate is unacceptably high. The school district is facing huge financial challenges and is in need of classroom resources. Our children, our parents and our teachers deserve better than the status quo."
Barrett was taking a shot at an event held by the Milwaukee Public School Defense League and another press conference earlier in the week questioning the plan.
Barrett's idea received surprising backing from usual foe Ald. Bob Donovan.
"I'm disappointed that special interests and those inclined to pander to them are now chiming in on the possible switch to mayoral control of MPS," he said. "Mayor Barrett and I have differed on many issues over the years, this is certainly not one of them. I stand 110 percent behind the switch to mayoral control. ... Special interests are looking to protect their corner of the MPS cookie jar."
Donovan's leader on the Common Council, Ald. Willie Hines took the middle ground.
"Perhaps at the end of the day, a strict form of mayoral governance will not get us where we need to be. However, it should not prevent us from having a healthy, intelligent discussion that results in sound, substantive improvement. It is painfully apparent that we cannot continue to support the status quo."
Congresswoman Gwen Moore got in the scrap as well, choosing to take on the voucher program, as well.
"MPS is working with a flawed state funding formula that sends our public dollars to private schools outside of the city. Many of our students live in serious poverty, yet according to the Education Trust, Wisconsin spends $1,118 less per student in districts like ours than it does in the rest of the state. How are our kids supposed to concentrate on algebra when their stomachs are rumbling?" she said.
"I fully believe that the governor and the mayor have the best intentions for MPS; however, I have yet to hear a credible explanation of how these difficult challenges get fixed by simply changing the way that our school board is chosen."
More Prohibition News: The Journal Sentinel is patting itself on the back while laying off most of its writing staff. It claims that its over-the-top coverage of drunk driving is the driving force behind anti-drinking proposals floating around the Legislature.
Some of them are pretty creative. Here's one: Requiring that bartenders have no alcohol in them at all while bartending.
State Rep. Josh Zepnick (D-Milwaukee) thinks that bartenders should maintain absolute sobriety-that's 0.0 BAC -- when serving patrons since if they're too drunk they may not know when to cut someone off. So much for business owners' rights to set their own workplace rules.
He points to the tragic case in Franklin where a man was served several beers and shots when already drunk and then went out, drove, and killed a couple going to a Christmas Day party. But there really was little evidence that the bartender was drunk at the time.
The penalty for being caught three times would be revocation of the bartender's -- and the owner's -- license.
Zepnick's bill, AB 67, would also end the practice that a family member of the owner can be behind the bar when the owner is present. It would mandate that anyone behind the bar have a bartender's license.
He Wants to be Called Lieutenant: Milwaukee Ald. Tony Zielinski wouldn't mind playing second fiddle to the governor. He announced last week that will run for lieutenant governor next year in the fall 2010 election.
Zielinski has flirted with higher offices in the past, letting his name be floated for state Assembly, county executive and just recently, state attorney general.
Zielinski was first elected in 1988 as a Milwaukee County Supervisor, and has served since 2004 as an Alderman representing the southeast district of Milwaukee, including Bay View.
"The lieutenant governor has a bully pulpit to champion this state's law and order issues, promote a healthy economy and level the playing field for American workers, " said Zielinski in a statement. "That's my plan to move this state forward. I will aggressively champion Wisconsin."
Zielinski's campaign got off to an inconspicuous start, however, as his public relations firm, Zigman Joseph Stephenson, made his campaign announcement on a Friday, considered the worst day to get press coverage since no one pays attention to the news on the weekends.
Paying for Results: Milwaukee County Exec Scott Walker wasted no time getting a poll going after Gov. Jim Doyle announced he was quitting after next year. And it found that he was the front-runner. Walker reports that he's leading his GOP opponent Mark Neumann 57 percent to 21 percent and all his potential Democratic opponents.
His results:
In what the pollsters call the "Milwaukee media market," Walker claims a 51 percent to 42 percent lead over Barrett. The market, however, includes the most intensive Republican turf in the state in Waukesha and Ozaukee counties. In the case of Ozaukee County, it's the most Republican voting county in the country.
|
8 comments about this article. Post a comment / write a review. |
Posted by Broner on Aug. 29, 2009 at 12:55 a.m. (report)
OK, your one stars have convinced me. I'm wrong. More government regulations please!
| Rate this: |
Posted by Broner on Aug. 28, 2009 at 5:02 p.m. (report)
Ah, the greater good. Have you seen Hot Fuzz in which they kill people for the greater good? Sure, it's just a movie but doing things for what in your opinion is the greater good just might not be. Look, just because you don't agree with me doesn't mean my stances are illogical. I'm not anti-government but I am against the things like AB67 which is another politician's attempt to add one more regulation that businesses must follow. That certainly applies to my argument. Also, I don't smoke and live my existence 99% smoke-free. How do I do it? I don't frequent places that allow smoking very often. And somehow I don't as though my lifestyle has suffered. I'm the type of person who would prefer to go to a non-smoking bar given the choice. And guess what? There are a lot of us out there hence the number of non-smoking bars popping up. Society is becoming more and more smoke-free all the time and the market is adjusting. If the government really "cared" about our health, they'd ban smoking altogether - for the greater good as you put it. And one last thing, a lot of people rate me low because this website is frequented by and run by a lot of do-gooders who can't seen another side of the argument. And with that, you may hit one star and retort.
| Rate this: |
Posted by speakthetruth on Aug. 28, 2009 at 3:39 p.m. (report)
Broner, People rate you low because your argument lacks logic and your Libertarian leanings are counterproductive to the greater good. AB67 is not a good idea, but the rationale that you provided to refute its validity was neither applicable nor logical. You've clearly just inhaled too much secondhand smoke, hence the petty antics and incessant disagreeing with any type of regulation. Let me guess, you also simultaneously back tort reform and the limit of the business owner in terms of liability?
| Rate this: |
Posted by Chrisna on Aug. 28, 2009 at 1:41 p.m. (report)
I read that Zepnick is already backing off the "completely sober" aspect of the bill and is talking about a compromise. That said, screw a compromise. A bill like this should just be flatly shut down.
| Rate this: |
Posted by Broner on Aug. 28, 2009 at 1:05 p.m. (report)
Hey, if you're going to read the talkbacks and rate me low, have the courtesy to write why you disagree. For example, you should give your argument why it's a good idea that politicians increasingly strive to run our lives for us.
| Rate this: |
| Top Clicks | Top Searches | Most Talkbacks |