![]() | allysonrobinson: Clergy standing together in front: "If you need to fight - call us, we'll go to the Dept. of Transportation or the shelter w/ you." #tdor about 3 days ago |
| caroldn: I was watching one of the Bellevue Transportation Dept. workers out in the rain hauling a sign up. So many people work so hard rain or shine about 4 days ago |
| theboaters: Repair or Repower by Scott Walker link about 4 days ago |
![]() | ChanelLatrice: US Dept of Transportation issued PSA: "Buzzed Driving is Drunk Driving" * ... what do you think of that? TRUE or FALSE? about 4 days ago |
![]() | uwwinternships: WI Dept. of Transportation's UW-System Internship Program provides opps for a range of academic backgrounds. Interested? DM or email me. about 4 days ago |
![]() |
One DoT plan would raze 13 homes and one business to expand the Zoo interchange. |
| By Doug Hissom Special to OnMilwaukee.com E-mail author | Author bio More articles by Doug Hissom |
| Published Feb. 4, 2009 at 2:17 p.m. |
|
The state Department of Transportation took its road show to the Common Council last week briefing Milwaukee officials on its plan to redo the Zoo interchange. DOT says it is the busiest interchange in the state and needs some help in moving vehicles along. They offered a new road term called the "Texas U-turn."
But it didn't get a warm reception.
Aldermen have been skeptical of DOT highway expansion plans because they always seem to include tearing down homes or businesses. In one scenario the DOT presented for the Zoo interchange, 13 homes and one business would have to go. They assured aldermen, however, that it wasn't on the 'A' list of alternatives, even though they admitted it was still on the table.
But the DOT folks drew the ire of aldermen when they said there was no consideration of including light rail or other mass transit options in the redesign.
"I just don't think that's good planning," said Ald. Joe Davis. "We're losing the opportunity to bring people in the fold" of city transit options.
"We're by-passing a significant mode of transportation," chimed in Ald. Willie Hines. "It seems as if there is a really narrow approach here."
Ald. Bob Bauman noted that there has been no discussion about just fixing the road and not expanding the interchange. "Maybe we can do something else with the $300 million to $400 million we'd save," he said.
DOT representatives said the plan for the interchange is to make a final decision by April, which had Ald. Michael Murphy acknowledging that the city really has no say in what the DOT wants to do.
"You're asking us what our position is but in the past we been fairly well ignored," he said.
Debt-laden: Ask anyone if they could use an extra $133 million and the answer would most certainly be a swift yes. But when Milwaukee aldermen heard that's what the city is owed in back taxes, unpaid tickets and other fees, they cringed.
"I think the average citizen in this community would be shocked to hear this number," responded Ald. Bob Donovan.
"That is a staggering number," admitted Jim Klajbor of the comptroller's office. "We can do better."
The city has a number of tools it can use to get people to pay their bills -- including seizing income tax returns and property. In fact, the city treasurer's office expects the city to foreclose on more than 1,000 properties this year due to unpaid taxes.
Playground Politics: State Sen. Alberta Darling is usually content to lob criticism at Milwaukee Public Schools from her Republican district in River Hills. But now she and state Rep. Scott Gunderson (R-Waterford) want to inject themselves in the collective bargaining process of the teachers' union at MPS.
The two are proposing to eliminate the residency requirement for MPS teachers. The issue has always been a staple for the union, which chose long ago to trade pay raises for the residency requirement, but would still like it changed. Milwaukee and Chicago are the only two large city districts in the country that have a residency requirement. But we're not sure why Gunderson has all of the sudden taken an interest in what MPS is up to.
"Attracting and retaining more quality teachers would have a major positive impact on student achievement without costing a dime," said Gunderson. "And the best thing about this bill is that it will swiftly improve MPS because open positions would be filled based on merit and ability, and not be artificially limited based upon the residency status of a teacher."
Business Takes a Powder: It's probably more a symptom of having a weak candidate to back rather than any sort of soul searching on doing the right thing, but Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce has announced that it will not be a player in the state Supreme Court race this spring. Supreme Court Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson holds a substantial fund-raising and popular support edge over relatively unknown Jefferson County Judge Randy Koschnick.
WMC has spent millions on the past two court races and credits itself for helping two conservative justices get elected to the bench.
All is not lost for Koschnick, however, since he was endorsed this week by Wisconsin Right to Life.
I can sum up my career in one word, "independent judiciary," Abrahamson said at a debate last week.
Walking on Walker: The state Democratic Party feels that Milwaukee County Exec Scott Walker must have a decent chance of getting the governor's mansion. It's already taking potshots at Walker and his stealth-like campaign. The state party attacked Walker for sending out a press release regarding Gov. Jim Doyle's state of the state speech.
"Everyone knows Scott Walker is running for governor, and when he chose to use his county office to launch a political attack against Gov. Doyle, he broke the rules," said Joe Wineke, Chair of the Democratic Party of Wisconsin.
"Apparently Walker is against using tax dollars to create jobs, but has no problem using them to launch campaign attacks. ... Walker is apparently only concerned about creating new jobs for one person ... himself."
|
12 comments about this article. Post a comment / write a review. |
Posted by corrina252 on Feb. 6, 2009 at 8:12 p.m. (report)
Mr. Wohler, name ONE time when a huge spending bill stimulated the economy as well as tax cuts and other free market solutions. And please do not cite FDR's New Deal because a bit of research will reveal that the social spending mechanisms Roosevelt imposed on the country DID NOT get this country out of the Great Depression and, in fact, could have prolonged the Depression.
| Rate this: |
Posted by mike3333 on Feb. 6, 2009 at 1:49 p.m. (report)
"Mr Woland": You are illiterate with respect to the science of economics, macro, micro or otherwise. You created phrases using terms found in economics and exposed your ignorance of the subject. * It's like claiming you studied medicine by saying the patella needs to be analyzed for affects of paranoia and the thyroid stimulating hormone. Mike H
| Rate this: |
Posted by ChateauDweller on Feb. 6, 2009 at 9:37 a.m. (report)
Basic macroeconomics doesn't not say that a stimulus is necessary, only keynesian economics does. Most macroeconomists believe that monetary and tax policy changes are the correct way to avoid lengthy recessions.
| Rate this: |
Posted by corrina252 on Feb. 5, 2009 at 8:59 p.m. (report)
Mr. Woland, your rebuttal was downright laughable. Is it your premise that to disagree with the global warming fraud makes me somehow misinformed or naive? For every scientist and study you can come up with supporting global warming I can produce the same number of scientists and studies that state evidence to the contrary. What is it about ineffectual liberals, such as yourself, that makes them gravitate to mindless group think, such as global warming, lord obama's cult, or how a gigantic piece of legislation riddled with pork will help the economy. Look, I am old enough to remember other environmental con jobs that just never came to fruition. Remember, acid rain? Overpopulation? Food shortages? Global cooling and the Ice Age? In twenty years people will be looking back at clowns like you and think, "how did I ever buy into this ridiculous notion of man-made global warming"? As far as the rest of your ridiculous rebuttal I will embarass you more tomorrow.
| Rate this: |
Posted by Mr.Woland on Feb. 5, 2009 at 3:09 p.m. (report)
How do you even respond to someone like Corrina252? With evidence? He/she clearly isn't interested in it. There is clear academic consensus that 1) global climate change has occurred and is occurring and creates problems that need to be reckoned with, and 2) basic macroeconomics dictates that an expansionary and rapid-acting fiscal policy is needed in a recessionary climate (for know-nothings like Corrina252, a "stimulus"). Yet you deny both of these based on...nothing. Just like your argument against mass transit, which is based on...nothing. Seriously. Where are the facts that support your position? Rush said so? Charlie said so? How anti-education, delusional, and stupid does a person have to be to believe that Democrats have the power to create some kind of global academic conspiracy that gets knowledgable scientists of all cultures and political backgrounds to talk about the treats posed by climate change? How crazy do you have to be to believe as Corrina does that Democrats secretly tricked banks into disregarding risk, swindled Bush into running the economy into the ground, and somehow forced all of the other leading economies around the world to go into recession--just so we could pass a big stimulus package! Hooray! Of course, if Dems had this much power, why would they worry about getting Republican votes to approve legislation? Corrina, I'd love for you to send me your previous internet postings expressing your knowledge about what is best for the economy and stating your criticisms of Bush signing of on spending initiatives. You can post them on this site if you like.
| Rate this: |
| Top Clicks | Top Searches | Most Talkbacks |