![]() | raymondsmalley: Welcome to my personal twitter… Many of you know me from social media, writing, politics, or other projects… about 13 minutes ago |
![]() | temirov: What went wrong with fascist's politics? Have they merely gone too far? Or is it the notion of politics in itself which is the issue? about 26 minutes ago |
| FinallyAlecto: @molliescott ARGH. Why FG? Why!? I need Assassin/PEG/Con-Science/COD/Exo-politics/FAWY/ToaDA/Fury/RBS or something else FFS. about 34 minutes ago |
![]() | blackop_001: Disarray, no quick fix, for broken politics
Anarchy, live or die it's an eye for an eye about 41 minutes ago |
![]() | arkej: offered nomination for prominent position...flattered, but will also mean a lot of big thinking, politics, work and travel~to accept or not? about 48 minutes ago |
| By Dasha Kelly Special to OnMilwaukee.com E-mail author More articles by Dasha Kelly |
| Published May 24, 2007 at 8:48 a.m. |
|
I do not understand politics. I had to admit that recently to a room full of government watchdog blogger types. I suppose there was a purple horn sprouting from my forehead, too.
But it's true. I told them that I found politics to be a "painful exercise in idiocy." I've tried to absorb politics into my intellect with the daily headline updates, by diving deeper with the aide of alternative political magazines, tuning in to the pundit shows on TV and AM radio, sitting in on lectures, scanning blogs and listening in on the coffee shop diatribes.
Nothing.
It always sounds like the wah-wah-wah gibberish of Charlie Brown's teacher to me. How can the various camps of otherwise-intelligent leaders actually argue over the importance of providing quality education to every American child? Whether or not our nation's priority should be to preserve and sustain a fading middle America or to protect the unprecedented wealth of our country's smallest population? Should there really be extended conversation over the "immigrants" whose taxes we collect through creatively-coded provisions every year, even though their citizen papers seem permanently jammed in the government machine?
And please tell me the forensics champion who crafted the argument for spending billions of dollars on space exploration while 12 million U.S. children are going hunger every year?
Government officials are supposed to protect our children, and our neighborhoods, and our schools, and our jobs, and our seniors, and our forests, and our soldiers, and our legacy of artists and entrepreneurs, and our way of life.
It's a lot, I know. I don't let my idealism overwhelm the black-and-white pictures scattered in front of me. This is gargantuan mess to tidy up.
But it would seem, at least, that we could move closer and faster toward real-life solutions if our politics had not become so diseased with ego and greed.
And I haven't dismissed the notion that "ego" and "greed" are simply unavoidable synonyms for "politics." But I do still get woozy and a little nauseous when I'm reminded how powerless we are to keep the beast from devouring what little bit of freedom, peace and comfort we have left.
Weapons of Mass Destruction hidden with a nation that still wages is war using chunks of rubble? A war on drugs waged against disenfranchised poor people whose only access to the aforementioned drugs are through the government (poor folks can't afford jet planes, people)?
No Child Left Behind incantations leaving emaciated schools and hardened, spiritless educators? An aggressive campaign to protect the institution of marriage being led by adulterous politicians, lecherous talking heads and religious leaders who flagrantly engage questionable fetishes of their own? Remember the movie Dave, where Kevin Kline plays a fill-in president and uses –what was that called .. ? Oh yeah, COMMON SENSE to guide the cabinet toward a balanced budget?
I should not be able to gleam more hope from a movie set than the Oval office.
So I stopped paying attention to politics during the Reagan administration. For me, the Gipper and his country club cronies marked the mutation of a new brand of arrogance and entitlement. It became painful to watch them violate the unwealthy on a daily basis. To this day, for all the posturing and hollow bantering and subsequent NOTHING that takes place, political chatter might as well include legislature for rounding up the Hobbits and battling for Middle Earth. All nonsense.
Why waste my time, tears and brain cells on undebates that -- clearly -- are not being waged with actual progress in mind. We're either in this to move forward or we're in this … to just … move … around. So far, I haven't been convinced that "forward" is on the agenda of any politicians any more.
|
5 comments about this article. Post a comment / write a review. |
Posted by mkelover on May 29, 2007 at 11:31 a.m. (report)
I am not 100% sure who said it, either Thomas Paine or Thomas Jefferson: "The government that governs best, governs least" Government (and subsequently more government) is not the solution to societal/social problems in our country.
| Rate this: |
Posted by jennyklukas on May 26, 2007 at 1:40 p.m. (report)
Well written blog. Unfortunately though, when you began it by saying you knew nothing about politics despite your efforts in learning and then you continued with all your opinions on this subject you weren't versed in, it makde it sound as if you are ranting without prior experience to back your opinions. I'm sure this isn't the case but it may have been better for you to not begin the discussion with a statement that told us the readers you were uninformed but going to proceed with your opinion anyway. I was a bit confused. Please do continue your blogs, they are great in voice and style, just give yourself a little more credibility.
| Rate this: |
Posted by mitchgat on May 25, 2007 at 7:55 a.m. (report)
Hey GlamGirl: THANKS for saying exactly what I was going to say!
| Rate this: |
Posted by glamgirl on May 24, 2007 at 3:06 p.m. (report)
No wonder you don't understand politics. You obviously weren't taught about the US Constitution in our public schools. Let me see if I can help. Here is the preamble: The Constitution of the United States of America We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. That's it! That's all the Federal government should be involved in. You sound like you prefer lots of government involvement in your life. I for one believe in small government with as little intrusion as possible. Much of what they are involved in today are local issues (like caring for seniors, ensuring kids get educated, etc.). And even then, we can't keep the state out of our hair, either. Unlike our Founding Fathers, however, we haven't got the guts to replace our government or restore it to the beautiful system it once was. Some day it will crash on its own merits, and then we can rebuild... hopefully.
| Rate this: |
Posted by ChateauDweller on May 24, 2007 at 10:16 a.m. (report)
For someone who doesn't understand "politics," you sure are able to recite the DNC talking points qutie nicely. Maybe your disillusionment stems from your expectation of government. Do you really think that government shoud solve all the problems in our society?
| Rate this: |
|
March 01, 2008 Have you ever stopped to consider the skill inventory of human resource (HR) professionals? ... |
|
Feb. 20, 2008 The headline about a state of emergency in Georgia was provocative, to say the least. |
|
Feb. 15, 2008 I'm staring in a dramedy about a woman's week-long series of screwy mishaps and strange ... |
|
Feb. 05, 2008 Some people are cool, calm and collected under pressure. I'm not one of them. |
|
June 08, 2007 I was indulging in a bit of vanity tonight. Yes, I admit it. I like to Google myself from ... |
| Top Clicks | Top Searches | Most Talkbacks |