![]() |
Mayor Tom Barrett wants to offer discounted water to companies wanting to do business in Milwaukee. |
| By James Rowen Special to OnMilwaukee.com E-mail author | Author bio More articles by James Rowen |
| Published Nov. 7, 2009 at 12:13 p.m. |
|
I was really pleased to see Mayor Tom Barrett and the M7 Water Council to at least think aloud and in unison about a way to bring business to Milwaukee: discount the price of water to businesses willing to locate within the city.
It's a far better use of Lake Michigan water than gearing up the difficult political, legal and financial machinery needed to divert it out of the Great Lakes basin -- say, to Waukesha -- believing that some economic benefits will trickle back to Milwaukee along with a few bucks thrown Milwaukee's way from the buyer.
All the Lakefront communities -- from Kenosha to Green Bay -- are located within the Great Lakes basin, and have water treatment and wastewater facilities already up and running, with some, like Milwaukee, having excess capacity in the built infrastructure.
With proper water conservation and other best management practices, the Lakefront communities can maximize their access to and use of water.
Furthermore, the discounting plan underscores the nature of the Lakefront area and watershed as a region that is more real and naturally-defined that the silly, seven-county Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission -- a construct made by drawing lines on a map that aggregated counties 50 years ago in a structure that functions poorly, and disadvantages the Lakefront communities at the expense of suburbs and rural areas.
Why is Milwaukee in a planning region with Walworth County?
Or with Waukesha County, which does not want to participate with Milwaukee city and county on transit, housing, and job growth?
Water is the key to Milwaukee and the Lakefront communities' definition, identity and future.
Give Barrett and the M7 Water Council credit for thinking big.
Encourage them to keep at it.
|
4 comments about this article. Post a comment / write a review. |
Posted by mike3333 on Nov. 10, 2009 at 3:37 p.m. (report)
Any reduction in taxes is a good thing.
| Rate this: |
Posted by BrewCityAllstar on Nov. 9, 2009 at 9:11 a.m. (report)
I agree, mkelover. Lowering water prices is not going to incentivize businesses to relocates jobs here... Water prices went down, but taxes are still astronomical.
| Rate this: |
Posted by Jimmy_Jones on Nov. 8, 2009 at 7:56 p.m. (report)
Yeah, Milwaukee's water rates are ridiculous: Quarterly average water bills for high-volume industrial customers: Sheboygan: $37,119 Milwaukee: $41,151 St. Louis: $53,497 Green Bay: $64,086 Chicago: $65,800 Dallas: $79,512 Louisville: $80,087 Kansas City: $90,544 Philadelphia: $105,717 Denver: $110,717 New York: $115,528 Cleveland: $121,430 San Diego: $157,557 Pittsburgh: $172,367 Phoenix: $176,405 Seattle: $209,482 Atlanta: $251,984 Los Angeles: $274,000 Source: Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
| Rate this: |
Posted by mkelover on Nov. 8, 2009 at 6:39 p.m. (report)
Smart thinking? Hmmm...let's see, water in Milwaukee is already incredibly inexpensive compared to rates across the country so what's the point of discounting something that's already VERY cheap to begin with?!? Here's some "smart thinking"...why not "discount" personal, property, and business taxes which are some of the HIGHEST in the region/country.
| Rate this: |
|
Nov. 07, 2009 Kudos to Tom Barrett and the M7 Water Council for at least discussing a way to discount ... |
|
Oct. 27, 2009 Officials say they want input from citizens about the application for a Great Lakes diversion, ... |
|
Oct. 22, 2009 How can federal officials, especially after the change in administrations in Washington, ... |
|
Oct. 15, 2009 The water wouldn't begin to flow for five-to-eight years, but the beginning of the process ... |
|
Oct. 09, 2009 No political or environmental question in this region has gotten more attention in the ... |
| Top Clicks | Top Searches | Most Talkbacks |