Milwaukee's Daily Magazine Monday, Nov. 23, 2009
Today
Hi: 56
Lo: 41
Mon
Hi: 50
Lo: 39
Tue
Hi: 50
Lo: 40
Section Sponsor
Article Tools
Print this Article
Make text larger
Related Twitter Posts

  • crazygolfa:
    @crzyqbn each other. And the key is how the teams play the Redskins. Either Dallas, NYG or Philly is going to lose to the Redskins.

  • Keeninsight:
    I'm not sold that the Redskins would have been better with Mark Sanchez or Jay Cutler. They should go for a can't miss OT and maybe a CB.

  • travellingcari:
    #JayCutler, chicken cutlet. So much for birthday present from #Bears or #Redskins

  • notlarrysabato:
    With the Redskins out, I am rooting for the Eagles or Giants to the take the East.

  • gamedayrivals:
    Are you concerned about the Cowboys Ugly win over the Redskins? Or is this just part of the NFL and your happy... link


Follow us on Twitter ...
In Sports Commentary
A Redskins fan calls for his team to go on a strict diet
The Redskins need to punt some players to stay under the cap.  
By Steve Czaban RSS Feed
Special to OnMilwaukee.com

E-mail author | Author bio
More articles by Steve Czaban

Published Feb. 20, 2008 at 5:05 a.m.
Tags: redskins, dan snyder, vinnie cerrato, mark brunell, aaron ross, steve smith, jay alford, ahmad bradshaw

The Washington Redskins under Daniel M. Snyder began this off-season roughly $20 million over the salary cap and, judging by the recent silence on their waiver wire, they are having a devil of a time figuring out how to trim the remaining fat.

Already, Snyder and Vinny Cerrato have plucked the low hanging fruit of cap management, re-working big base numbers for guys like Chris Cooley and Randy Thomas for 2008.

But since then, not a single notable player has been cut.

All of this, while other teams -- like the Dolphins (Zach Thomas), the Bears (Mushin Muhammed), and the Falcons (Algae Crumpler) - already have started cleaning house.

I have no doubt that some dead wood will be taken out back. They simply can't re-work everybody. But how much dead wood will be cleared? It will be fascinating to watch.

Logically, it's time to get off the train on certain players. Not just easy targets, like Mark Brunell ($3 million in base salary last year) and Brandon Lloyd (the two-catch, $7 million bonus man). But guys like Shawn Springs and Jon Jansen have essentially outlived their usefulness here.

And it hurts me to say that, because Springs is, and has been, absolutely one of my FAVORITE Redskins since Snyder took over the team. He's been a stud on the field, a totally honest, standup guy in the locker room and keenly aware of what is hype, and what is reality.

Beyond 2008, he just won't be viable as a starting corner in this league.

Of course, a guy like Greg Blache isn't even thinking past 2008. He just wants to win this year, which could be his last in coaching depending on how things work out. So naturally, he's lobbying hard to keep Springs, even if it means at a very expensive rate (perhaps as much as $8 million on the cap).

Which brings us back to the need for a sober eyed, general manager; a guy who understands when to dump certain players based on age and salary cap number.

Danny and Vinny obviously have no clue about this.

Jansen also is a stand up guy, has been a fixture here since even before Snyder, and can still play. But, he's awfully expensive. And he's not getting any younger or healthier.

The bottom line: Snyder's spending and cap manipulation through the years has allowed him to always have something to spend every winter on toys. He has avoided a single year of total cap purgatory, where half the showroom had to be sold for pennies on the dollar, and you couldn't afford to bring in anybody over the league minimum.

(Note: It also helped Snyder that in Marty Schottenheimer's ONE year here, he let a LOT of air out of the "Dead Cap" balloon, which gave Snyder more room to maneuver once he was ousted.)

This year, I fully expect the 'Skins and their team of green eyeshades to find a way to get under their NFL credit card spending limit, make the minimum payment on the balance and go out shopping again.

But, I think we now know the upper end result of this approach. It rhymes with 10 and 6.

As in, that's roughly the record this approach will bring as a result. Sure, you are going to get some good players with your money. Marcus Washington, Springs, Thomas, and Fletcher are proof of that.

But your busts will be expensive as well: Archuleta, Lloyd, and other lesser whiffs add up.

So you will be left in a perpetual state of "not quite good enough." You can say that Snyder has had decent success doing it "his way" through the years. He has been to the playoffs in three of the nine years he's owned the team, and he's advanced to the second round twice.

But the best record he's had in that span is 10-6. And, it needs to be noted, those were really "10-6*" records.

In 1999, the Dolphins sent a JV team to FedEx Field in Week 17 because it didn't matter to them if they won or lost. The 'Skins has just clinched the division the week before in San Francisco. So that's a SOFT 10-6.

Then in 2005, the Redskins had a real scare in Philly in Week 17, with the Eagles well out of things. Needing to win, Andy Reid inexplicably replaced Mike McMahon (who had thrown two touchdowns) with Koy Detmer midway through the game. Detmer was overwhelmed, and the Skins snuck out with an 11-point victory. Another "soft" 10-6 finish.

Naturally, some dopes in the NFL media still don't get it. They will inevitably write that Redskins fans are "lucky" to have an owner willing to spend.

Obviously, these writers are confusing football with say, baseball.

There, indeed, some owners are just squatting on their franchises, content to turn a small profit, or perhaps lose small money as the equity in their teams grows through the years. Unlike baseball, football has a salary cap. But it also has a salary FLOOR, which means even the notoriously penny-pinching teams like Cincinnati and Arizona cannot -- by league accounting rules -- fall out of relative parity with even the Patriots and Cowboys.

'Skins fans are hardly "lucky" that Snyder spends the way he does. We're cursed. Snyder's supposed virtue ("I just want to win!") is actually a vice ("I don't know how to stop myself!")

After nearly a decade of this nonsense, we've seen the upper limits. You can be pretty good, but not at all great spending this way. You might parlay a late hot streak into 10 wins, but you will almost surely never be a dominant 13-3 or 14-2 club unless you get unbelievably lucky one year.

I'm not saying that dead cap money is fatal. A recent article pointed out that the Giants actually led the league last year in that stat -- $18 million -- and it worked out pretty well for them, didn't it?

Of course, the Giants' ability to keep their hand in the fire and endure excruciating pain longer than most would have on their head coach. Continuity in the NFL, is clearly a supreme edge for teams that can get it, and keep it.

Also, look at the rookies who helped get the Giants across the finish line this year: Aaron Ross, Steve Smith, Jay Alford and Ahmad Bradshaw were all huge in December and January.

Winning in the NFL is always going to be a function of total team talent, not just an expensive veneer of it purchased in March, once slick talking agents start working the phones.

Some teams get it. Others are doomed to repeat their mistakes.

6 comments about this article.
Post a comment / write a review.

Recent Talkbacks ...

Posted by spectre11 on Feb. 25, 2008 at 11:36 a.m. (report)

Do we really need any more Packers news? Until Brett makes up his mind to announce that he's comin back next year, I really dont see the point. The Bucks suck. The NFL draft is a long ways off. Baseball is still a bit off. Even March Madness really doesnt fire up for a few weeks. Right now we are in the doldrums of the sports universe. There aint much to talk about boys and girls. So I, for one, do enjoy hearing something new and interesting about Lord Football. Especially something as dysfunctional as Daniel Snyder and the way he runs the Redskins. (Sorry Czabe.) Its been fascinating to see him manage (or mismanage) the salary cap. Plus, it makes you really appreciate what Ted Thompson has been able to do with the Pack. Keep up the solid work Czabe.

Rate this:
  • Average rating: 0.0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


Posted by dannyhurtle on Feb. 21, 2008 at 9:47 a.m. (report)

Got to agree with cj, give me a Drew Olson article...even nfl wide the Redskins are irrelevant. Oh wait, LaVar Arrington was a great pick, discuss.

Rate this:
  • Average rating: 0.0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


Posted by r0blove on Feb. 20, 2008 at 8:11 p.m. (report)

cj, who would you prefer over The Czabe? Please keep it up, Czabe -loyal daily blog reader

Rate this:
  • Average rating: 0.0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


Posted by cjvanmeter on Feb. 20, 2008 at 3:38 p.m. (report)

Exactly why do we in WI care about the Redskins? Let's have a sports guy who write pertinent articles.

Rate this:
  • Average rating: 0.0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


Posted by chris_chicago on Feb. 20, 2008 at 3:12 p.m. (report)

The Redskins' cap situation is not as dire as some people are reporting. If they cut Brunell, Lloyd and Todd Wade (essentially the #4 OT), they are just about compliant with the cap. They build their contracts to be able to convert roster bonuses to signing bonuses as they did with Cooley and as they probably will do with Portis. It's also ill-informed to suggest that cutting Jon Jansen is the way to go. While he can no longer justify his cap charge based on a couple of recent injury-plagued seasons, to cut him would accelerate so much guaranteed money into the current cap year that his dead cap charge would be higher than his scheduled cap charge. Their philosophy seems to be to take advantage of the time-value of money, in terms of a dollar on today's cap is a higher percentage of today's cap than the same dollar figure will be in future cap years (as the cap continues to rise). This is why they prefer big bonuses and minimum base salaries. I think the real flaw in the team's approach is in not properly valuing draft picks and trading away too much in return for too little. Building through the draft makes the mistakes like Archuletta less painful because it's generally cheaper to pay the guys at the bottom of your roster when they're home-grown players that you drafted in the mid-to-late rounds. The thing that hurt with Lloyd was that they traded for him (restricted free agent) and gave him a lucrative contract. If he had simply been an unrestricted free agent at the same price, that would've been bad enough, but it was compounded by throwing away picks in acquiring him.

Rate this:
  • Average rating: 0.0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5




Show me the other Talkback
OnMilwaukee.com is part of the In Click Network. Other In Click sites include: 30RockReport.com | Behind The Scenes at OnMilwaukee.com | BetterRecipes.org | Bimmer Digest | Brain Brawn & Body | BrewCityBeats.com | Brewcitybigscreen.com | britneysnation.com | BritPop Rocks | Brooklynbanter.com | CactusLeagueReport.com | Caffeinateddigest.com | Culinary Piedmont | Cycling Chainring | Daily Lost Update | Daily Milwaukee News | Daily Spa | DannyGokeyMilwaukee.com | Dogs Blogs | EarthFueled.com | Edible Wisconsin | FanaticPhotog.com | Gadget Deals and Steals | GolfLinksWisconsin.com | H1N1 Alerts | H1N1 Blog | H1N1 Prevention | H1N1 Reporter | H1N1 Tracker | HogEnthusiast.com | Informed Runner | iPhone Daily Report | Man United Nation | Milwaukee Brewers Nation | Milwaukee Bucks Blog | Milwaukee Dad | Minnesota Wild Nation | MomMilwaukee.com | My Super Stocks | MyGayMilwaukee.com | MyHangoverHelper | News on Draught | NY Mets Nation | OnAtlantaGA.com | OnAustinTX.com | OnBaltimoreMD.com | OnBirminghamAL.com | OnBostonMass.com | OnBuffaloNY.com | OnCharlotteNC.com | OnCincinnati.com | OnClevelandOH.com | OnColumbusOH.com | OnDallas.com | OnDCmetro.com | OnDenverCO.com | OnDetroitMI.com | OnDoorCounty.org | OnFortLauderdale.com | OnGreenBay.com | OnHartford.com | OnIndianapolisIN.com | OnKansasCityMO.com | OnLakeCountry.com | OnLosAngelesCA.com | OnLouisvilleKY.com | OnMadison.com | OnMemphisTN.com | OnMiamiFLA.com | OnMilwaukee.com Cars | OnMilwaukee.com Metro Headlines | OnNashvilleTN.com | OnNewOrleansLA.com | OnNYCny.com | OnOrlandoFL.com | OnPalmSprings.com | OnPhiladelphia.com | OnPhoenixAZ.com | OnPittsburgh.com | OnPortlandOR.com | OnProvidence.com | OnRichmondVA.com | OnSacramento.com | OnSaltLakeCity.com | OnSanAntonioTX.com | OnSanDiegoCA.com | OnSanFran.com | OnSanJose.com | OnSeattleWA.com | OnSinCity.com | OnStLouis.com | OnStPetersburg.com | OnTampaBay.com | OnTucsonAZ.com | OnTwinCities.com | OnWichita.com | OnWindyCity.com | Packers Posts | Porsche 911 Fans | PriusFans.com | Roller Derby Network | SnuggieFans.com | SummerfestRocks.com | Swine Flu China | Swine Flu Reporter | The 24 Reporter | The Barack Obama Fan Club | The Brilliant Manager | The Comic Book Reporter | The In Click | The Office Fan Blog | TheHDTVReporter.com | TheNetbookBlog.com | TheNewParentBlog.com | Trueguitarheroes.com | Vintage Mets | VW Busses | WaukeshaWeekly.com | Weekly Media News | Wisconsincustomhomenews.com | WisWomen.com | Woodworker Digest