Milwaukee Talks: Bucks' VP John Steinmiller
OMC: Those teams also produced some of the more memorable names in franchise history. Many of their jersey numbers are hanging from the Bradley Center rafters.
JS: Those teams were solid. Nobody was satisfied with 50-win seasons, but they were good teams. There was great chemistry with Brian Winters, Bob Lanier, Junior Bridgeman and later, Sidney Moncrief ... just some solid teams.
OMC: A lot of the players you just mentioned came to Milwaukee as a result of the Kareem trade. What was it like having to trade a player who was arguably the best in the game at that time?
JS: It was interesting, for sure. Kareem used tremendous diplomacy and had tremendous respect for the game and the organization. He didn't make his wishes known in a way that would hamstring us, unlike what you see these days. He had his mind made up; he dealt with ownership in confidentiality and candor.
Ownership, to their credit, didn't roll over by any means. They tried to persuade him to stay, but in the end he was determined. He allowed the franchise to pretty much get the most they could under the circumstances. In the end, it set us up pretty well for many years with a lot of those players. In fact, we made the playoffs the next year while they missed it. Our best player had been traded, but we were in good shape in terms of building for the future.
OMC: The team also had to get used to a new coach after Larry Costello -- who had coached the team since its inception -- stepped down early in the season.
JS: Nelson was an unlikely replacement after 13 games. We got through that season and from then on we were in the playoffs every year but one. I think 1978-'79 was the only year we missed under Nelson.
OMC: You mentioned how small the front office is when you came on board. What's changed over the years?
JS: Because of the growth of the sport, it's a much larger business and grows every year. There are 30 teams now. The broadcast and media exposure and the money needed to have a viable franchise and the people needed to make it successful are so much bigger now than when I first started. It requires so many more people and so much more expertise than it did in the 1970s. It's a much larger business than it's ever been and it's only going to get bigger.
OMC: The game itself is a little different than it was in the 1970s, too. It seems to be more, maybe isolated. Have you noticed anything on the court that may be different now?
JS: The players are so much different now. I'm not saying they're better-conditioned. In the 1970s and '80s, the off-season training and conditioning activities were much more basketball-focused. Strength training didn't really come around until the later part of the '80s.
The players now have been on weight and strength programs since high school. Our players now are stronger and better conditioned. In some ways, they're products of a high school or college system that is often short-circuited. There's also a lot of AAU and summer camps and things like that. It's a different level and in some cases, I don't think all the players are as ready for the NBA as players were back then after four years of high school and college.
That's even more abundant with the number of players coming out early or skipping college altogether. There was a maturation process. Development is speeded up now. We're getting younger players who are very talented but still trying to catch up with their more established peers off-the-court.
OMC: How has the franchise changed in terms of how it fits into the community?
JS: I think our community outreach is as great as it's ever been. Our entire team is out there several times a month doing different things. During our 28-day training camp, our whole team was out in grocery stores and schools. Yi was out changing smoke alarms and behind a deli counter at Pick 'N Save. Our players understand that it's our responsibility to do good things and help people have better lives and be part of the community. They know the represent the franchise off-the-court. Its part of being a Milwaukee Buck and it always will be.
OMC: Milwaukee has a lot of sporting options for a market its size. Not too many cities along these lines have two NCAA Division I programs, Major League Baseball, the NBA and even though it's in Green Bay, the NFL. Where do the Bucks fall?
JS: For the city, we have more sports than any market its size. No doubt about it, it's not even close. Like you said, we have D-I, MLB, NBA, NBA and professional soccer and hockey. There's auto racing and a pro golf tournament that Chicago doesn't have every year anymore. All those things in line, this market has a great menu for sports that far exceeds what economists say the market can support.
OMC: Does that make it harder for your staff to do their job and sell the product and the franchise?
JS: I don't think it's hard, per se. It's a condition that you know of, address and accept. You find out as much as you can, do the best you can and find ways to get better. We don't look at the market size as a negative but rather an opportunity. We try to figure out how to expand in Wisconsin, into Northern Illinois, up north, out west. We can't go east because the lake is there but we need to know our market and how to grow it. We're here. We're going to stay viable. Maybe it's hard in some ways, but those who look at it as hard aren't going to succeed.
OMC: One thing I've noticed that's impressive is that while there is a lot of talk in town about the future of the Bucks and the Bradley Center, the team -- unlike in some cities where there are public threats of moving or demands for new facilities -- is more inclined to work from within. How important is it to use the existing building to generate revenue?
JS: It's critical. We have to maximize every possible source of revenue in the building. The community at large will make the decisions that need to be made at the right time. In cooperation with the Bradley Center, the Bucks have matched the Bradley Center's desires to get the most out of the building.
OMC: People talk about a replacement, but it's only 20 years old. It still looks pretty new in most places. How have the Bradley Center people Sen. (Herb) Kohl worked together on the situation?
JS: It's a solid facility, but it lacks the ability to do certain things that some other, newer buildings do in terms of generating sponsorship revenue and providing fan amenities. In the interim, while the solution is discussed and debated, there are great steps being made that can help us during this period. Some of it we're doing ourselves, some we're doing with help from the Bradley Center. It's a partnership and it has to be.
Sen. Kohl, as owner, is never going to leverage his situation the way most sports owners would or have. Sometimes, it's a disadvantage, but it's the professional and model citizen way of doing business.
You're right, though. We've carved out areas and new destinations and created new things within the building. The Bradley Center looks great. It's a great facility. This building today looks as great as more than half the buildings in the league. This building is a good-looking 20-year-old.
OMC: It's hard to believe the Bucks have played more seasons in the Bradley Center than they did at the Arena. Can you ever recreate the experience and the atmosphere of that building?
JS: Yeah, we were at the Arena I think 19 years and we've been here 20. We were over 90 percent capacity almost every night there. It kind of makes you wonder where we'd be if we had 15 or 16,000 seats in that era. We had to turn fans away then and there wasn't as much TV so we really, in essence, turned away a lot of nurturing fans when we played in the building that only seated about 11,000 fans.
OMC: Is it fair to say that the Bucks wouldn't be here anymore had the Bradley Center not been built 20 years ago?
JS: It's very fair. It was a situation where the owner then gave the city 90 to 120 days to find a way to find a local owner. Sen. Kohl was certainly the last person on the order of interest and the only one to really step up.
OMC: What have you added this year?
JS: Our suite holders can take advantage of new valet parking at 6th & State Streets. We've upgraded our Club Cambria area and added Club 71, which is a new party-suite type of atmosphere that's already sold out for the season. Miller Brewing renovated a suite space that they will use as a way to bring their people into the building. And, of course, Yi.
OMC: What did bringing Yi Jianlian and the Chinese market into the fold mean for the franchise?
JS: I think along with the Chinese element, he comes to the team when we have a young, deep and talented roster. Lost in the cultural discussion is the fact that we're adding another young, talented player to the roster. I think we focus too much sometimes on that he's from China; he's a heck of a player. He's arrived on the scene with a good team. That said, he makes us a better team and at the same time opens up our franchise, the NBA and the Milwaukee 7 region to the people of China.
We found out that 35 of our games -- 21 of them from Milwaukee -- will be televised in China. That means our team, our product and our game-day experience will be introduced in China. Where else outside of the United States do you want to be in terms of growth? He brings a great deal of talent, enthusiasm and interest not just from China, but from around here as well.
<< BackPage 2 of 2 (view all on one page)
There is no discounting Mr. Steinmiller's commitment and years served with the franchise. It's unmatched. But.......I feel that Steinmiller, Grayson, and Ron Walter are socially and economically inept to be guiding an NBA global brand and success on the floor. I understand that being under the thumb of the Senator is a big challenge, but best intentions aside this small-minded, lowest common denominator thinking by the Bucks braintrust and culture (Steinmiller included) has landed a once proud team into a black hole of mediocrity. I think it's time for a new ownership group and attitude immediately that can rehab one of Milwaukee's true assets.
Total puff piece. Maybe you should have asked him why the Bucks underachieve every year and if they will ever get a decent coach.
Steinmiller is a class act. Both Milwaukee and the Bucks are truly lucky to have him around. Go Bucks!
How fitting. 40th Anniversary must also equal losing to the last place team in the conference by 40 or more points.... Bucks need to make some changes and fast...
4 comments about this article.
Post a comment / write a review.
Disclaimer: Please note that Facebook comments are posted through Facebook and cannot be approved, edited or declined by OnMilwaukee.com. The opinions expressed in Facebook comments do not necessarily reflect those of OnMilwaukee.com or its staff.