Advertise on OnMilwaukee.com

In Buzz Commentary

More and more, it's becoming critical for our citizenry to establish the credibility of the messenger.

Alternative visions of the same green earth

It's growing more difficult by the day to find true objective analysis of the issues of our time. Both ends of the political spectrum are loaded with false prophets, people who take a predisposed vision of the world and then try to mold the facts to fit that viewpoint, even if that reality is in absolute contradiction to their core beliefs.

More and more, it's becoming critical for our citizenry to establish the credibility of the messenger.

I was thinking about that the other day when I was visited by Willie Soon, Ph.D., a physicist at the Solar, Stellar and Planetary Sciences Division of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.

Soon and a couple of other folks connected with the Americans for Prosperity organization stopped by my office the other day to try to convince me that the green movement toward more efficient and cleaner sources of energy is a farce.

Americans for Prosperity is a non-profit group "committed to educating citizens about economic policy and a return of the federal government to its Constitutional limits."

Soon says the earth's rising temperatures are being caused by natural cycles of the sun. In essence, the sun sometimes burns hotter, and in response, the earth gets warmer, he says.

According to Soon, we need not be concerned about rising levels of carbon dioxide and emissions from automobiles and coal plants, because mankind is not capable of causing global warming.

When I asked Soon about what America's energy strategy should be, he said we should drill for more oil. He said we should drill in the National Parks, we should drill more offshore and we should drill in the Arctic.

Drill, baby, drill.

A few days later, I visited an alternative universe. I was invited to a private luncheon to meet Robert Iorio, manager of hybrid propulsion implementation engineering for Ford Motor Co.

Iorio oversees a team of 40 engineers who enabled Ford to develop the 2010 Fusion, a hybrid car that will be available in March. The new Fusion, with a retail price of $27,995, will have the highest gas mileage in the industry, at 41 miles per gallon.

With the Fusion, the gas engine shuts off as the vehicle is stopped or in cruise mode, when a nickel metal hydride battery then powers the car. The Fusion also features "regenerative braking," in which energy is captured when the brakes are applied and then transferred to recharge the battery.

Maybe you've noticed that, unlike General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC, Ford has not needed to apply for any federal bailout dollars thus far. That's because Ford foresaw the economic downturn, streamlined its company into "one Ford" a few years ago and secured a rather cheap line of credit to help it survive the recession, Iorio said.

"We have not yet gone to the government (for bailout funds) and don't intend to," Iorio said.

Ford will double its production of hybrids this year to 50,000 vehicles.

Meanwhile, Ford is not idling. The company has signed a contract for Glendale-based Johnson Controls Inc. to produce batteries for its next generation of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles to be introduced in 2012.

Ford's biggest challenge now is marketing, Iorio said. The company somehow needs to convince the American public that its vehicles are equal to or better than the foreign competition, he said.

Oh, and the new Fords will be more fuel efficient and will produce less emissions. I wonder if Dr. Soon will drive one anyway.


Talkbacks

ChateauDweller | March 12, 2009 at 8:59 a.m. (report)

Your article begins by complaining about the lack of objectivity in the media, but then you talk about a scientist and a car. What does either have to do with media objectivity? I don't think you are being objective when you insert the "drill baby drill" jab.....do as I say, not as I do?

Rate this:
  • Average rating: 0.0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Greener Milwaukee | March 11, 2009 at 4:44 p.m. (report)

Steve, Great insight into the polarizing views of climate change and how we address the issue in different capacities. I think there is something to be said for sustainability in terms of both the bottom line and conservation. I don't think i'm keen on drilling in the national parks however, and instead of drilling, I'm more with our local leaders in the civic sense than that of industrial oil. Green is good for business as right now green means, "Jobs, baby, jobs" Ryan, Director http://GreenerMilwaukee.com

Rate this:
  • Average rating: 0.0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 comments about this article.
Post a comment / write a review.

Facebook Comments

Disclaimer: Please note that Facebook comments are posted through Facebook and cannot be approved, edited or declined by OnMilwaukee.com. The opinions expressed in Facebook comments do not necessarily reflect those of OnMilwaukee.com or its staff.