Cuts slash budgets beyond MPS, too
Of course, as a Milwaukee resident and taxpayer -- and the dad of an MPS student, and a prospective one -- the stress I feel over the current budget battle in Madison is focused on how the decimation of public school funding will affect my children, the children of my friends, neighbors and co-workers and all of the kids in the city.
But, communicating with Curt Rees -- a principal in Onalaska, out near LaCrosse -- is a good reminder that public schools across the state will feel the same pain. While the cuts affecting MPS are astronomical in comparison, that's only because we have such a large district. In terms of percentage, MPS is not facing the largest cut.
In fact, according to a DPI spreadsheet that hypothesizes how the proposed budget would have affected districts this school year -- had it been in effect -- Onalaska would have seen cut of 10.3 percent. MPS would have lost 8 percent.
"Frustrated would be the first feeling that comes to mind in terms of the state budget," Rees wrote to me in an email.
"Expectations continue to go up in terms of student achievement, but our resources are dwindling. I've been at my school (Northern Hills Elementary, which scores 8 out of 10 on GreatSchools.org) for 7 years and my site budget -- which takes care of supplies, copy machine, professional development, building repairs, etc. -- has never seen an increase. Our budget had been frozen for 6 years and then took a 10 percent cut last year to help make ends meet for the district."
Rees says he worries most about what the cuts mean for the future of the institution of free public education for all American children.
"If people are allowed to use vouchers to go to any school they want, what will that do for the kids who need the most help, but don't have knowledgable and resourceful parents to advocate for them? Maybe public schools will just be the place for the 'leftover' kids. I can't ever see that as being a benefit for any part of society.
"I love reading about Thomas Jefferson's push for a system of public education," Rees continues. "He did so because he wanted every U.S. citizen to be skilled enough to care for themselves and to be learned enough to make good decisions while being a part of a democracy. Without a strong public ed system, will our citizens be able to do either of these?"
Onalaska School District has a three-year average enrollment of 2,861 and has a base revenue of $9.473 per student. Comparable numbers for MPS are 85,455 and $10,104. There are three elementary schools, one middle school, one high school and an early education center in the Onalaska district. At the start of this school year, MPS had 184 schools, including 118 elementary schools, 8 middle schools, 40 high schools and 18 schools with combined grades.
Luckily for the district, Rees says, Onalaska is bolstered by a very supportive community.
"Our parents are great about helping their kids be successful in school. Local businesses and groups are also great supporters of our schools. Our community passed a funding referendum (about five years ago) to allow us to remodel our oldest elementary school and then take care of several other capital projects in the district -- HVAC, safety projects, parking lot repaving, etc.
"We also just passed a referendum on Feb. 15 to give us operating money to maintain the programs and people we already have in place, which have been very successful. But it seems like the state has not followed through on their end of the deal. We had the QEO (note: the QEO limits how much schools can raise as a means to limit spending) in place for 17 years to keep employee compensation down and the state was supposed to provide 2/3 of our funding. Compensation certainly stayed down, but the state funding kept shrinking and shrinking and looks to be outright chopped for this next budget cycle."
So, even while Onalaska has a supportive community and has apparently followed the revenue rules, times have grown tighter and tighter due to state cuts. This latest round of proposed cuts puts further stress on the district's finances. Rees says the big hurt will come the year after next in Onalaska.
According to the DPI, Onalaska faces a $2.4 million cut from the state in 2011-12 and $3.2 million the following year. The numbers are $71 million and $95 million in MPS.
"Because of our successful referendum, we'll be OK this coming year in maintaining the status quo, but we had hoped that the state funding would be there so our local money could allow us to do another school remodel and allow us to take care of other capital needs that come up every 5-ish years.
"We've held this thing together with spit and duct tape for several years, but how long can that last? A school's biggest assets are its teachers and staff. When the money is gone, positions will be eliminated, class sizes go up for kids, and then there are fewer class choices for them."
Onalaska, we feel your pain.
mezzoid- you are correct in your suggestion. I never claimed that more money would solve many problems. But your comment alone recognizes the key influence of parental involvement and expectations-- it is so very integral. And just a question, when people talk of "failing" schools or problematic schools- are they just the bigger city ones, or are there rampant issues with rural and suburban ones, too? I think many people confuse MPS with the other 425 districts in WI. Are there the same problems in Phelps and Sevastapol as in Racine and MPS? I gotta think no, maybe not so much. (Sorry, just selected a few from the chart that dbort linked**. Which by the perusal of it, we should be looking at Elmbrook-- what's going on there that they get as much aid as Brown Deer-- but have 5 times the employee budget?! They shell out more to workers than Eau Claire or LaCrosse. Well, Elmbrook (Brookfield and Elm Grove) must be as large and serving as many students as those cities... heck, MPS's exorbitant and undeserved benefits/budget is only 8 times as much as Elmbrook- those cities of Brookfield and Elm Grove must be HUGE! [for those not from the greater Milwaukee area, those comments are sarcasm] **Watch out dbort- your posted chart may expose other questionable circumstances some may prefer we not be privy to!!
"Waiting for Superman" presents a pretty compelling case for the problem with public education. The teacher's unions are a huge advocate for the status quo and a perpetual obstacle to meaningful reform. We spend double on each student (in inflation adjusted dollars) than we 30 years ago. Why aren't we seeing results? People complaining about 2011 budget cuts are missing the forest from the trees. Pretend that MPS is funded at 2010 levels. Then what? MPS (as a whole) was failing children in 2010 by any metric. The budget is just a huge distraction. We need meaningful reform, nor just more money.
Liberals have been in charge of public education in urban centers for over 50 years. They have failed. I think we owe it to our children to try something else. Anyone who thinks teachers' unions are good for kids is naive or a liar.
Stop whining and deal with the budget cuts! Families everywhere have had to tighten the purse strings.
Mezzoid Smallest class is 25 and largest is 32. Pretty similar to MPS. Strong parental involvement which does lack in MPS. So I'm pretty sure a lack of money is at the root of the problems at MPS
Show me the other 7 Talkbacks
12 comments about this article.
Post a comment / write a review.
Disclaimer: Please note that Facebook comments are posted through Facebook and cannot be approved, edited or declined by OnMilwaukee.com. The opinions expressed in Facebook comments do not necessarily reflect those of OnMilwaukee.com or its staff.