In Milwaukee Buzz
Ask OMC: What's up with the Humboldt Ave. bridge?
Here at OnMilwaukee.com, we take pride in being Milwaukee experts. Since it is literally our job to eat, sleep and breathe all things Brew City, we get many questions from our readers.
This is where we answer them.
In the "Ask OMC" series, we take your questions -- big or small -- and track down the answers. Send your query to askomc@staff.onmilwaukee.com. Be sure to include your name and location, and we will consider it for our next installment.
This week, we were inspired by a number of Talkbacks and e-mails that flowed into the editorial office in the wake of the closing of Good Life, a restaurant located at 1935 N. Water St. that was impacted by the ongoing construction of the Humboldt Avenue Bridge.
There were some common themes to the questions:
"What's the deal with the Humboldt Avenue Bridge?"
"Why is it taking so long?"
"When is it going to be done?"
"Why aren't you guys writing about this?"
We will get to the more common queries momentarily, but would like to point out that OnMilwaukee.com's Jeff Sherman addressed the issue a month ago, when he spoke to Robert Jenkins, co-owner of the Bayou, 2060 N. Humboldt Ave. You can read that interview here.
As for the other questions, we e-mailed Cecilia Gilbert of the Milwaukee Public Works Department and she passed along some basic information, as well as updates from some of the informational meetings that have been held since February.
First, the basics ...
The Humboldt Avenue Bridge project consists of building a bridge over the Milwaukee River, a bridge over Riverboat Road, a ramp providing access to Riverboat Road, six adjacent retaining walls, pavement approaches and utility alterations.
The bridge renovation started in October 2008, with an original completion date of this month and a budget of $9 million. Because it is a state-funded program, the city is paying 20 percent of the cost with the state picking up the rest of the tab.
In June, information was shared regarding the delay of work due to soil obstructions discovered after work began on the south Riverboat Road abutment. Foundation systems were subsequently redesigned and project sequencing revised. Extensive soil borings that were taken during the design phase did not reveal the extent of the obstructions encountered. A revised project timing extending completion into June 2010 was provided at that time.
Though the contractor later requested an extension into next fall, the Department of Public Works was adamant about accelerating the process and sticking to the June completion date.
Here is a look at the two most recent updates from city engineer Jeff Polenske and city construction manager Samir Amin:
Oct. 5 updates
Status of Major Project Components
- Pier foundation and the pier for the river bridge have been built in the waterway
- Both abutments for the river bridge have been constructed
- The railing wall on the southeast corner of the river bridge has been constructed
- The micro-piling operation for the entire foundation system has been completed
Construction Issues
- Due to alleged impacts to the adjoining property, the foundation system for the retaining wall adjacent to the ramp was redesigned to further ensure potential impact or conflicts with the existing shallow foundation system of the adjoining building were avoided. This foundation work is completed.
- This area of the ramp and retaining wall foundations was needed to safely deliver and install the girders for the river bridge and this work has been delayed to November.
- The delay of the girder installation postponed the bridge deck installation until 2010.
Subsequent Actions
As a result of concerns expressed at the stakeholders meeting, DPW staff met with the contractor to evaluate all potential to accelerate various components of the project.
The revised project scope required that the Riverboat bridge be built after completion of the river bridge since access on Riverboat Road could not be maintained during construction. A temporary reduced bridge clearance of 12 feet during construction was pursued and granted from the Milwaukee Fire Department which permitted access to be maintained beneath the bridge during its construction.
Page 1 of 2 (view all on one page)
Next >>
Talkbacks
jakeryan | June 2, 2010 at 12:09 p.m. (report)
Funny, was just seeing if I could find an update on this project. I know it is to easy bitch and there are alot of variables, but this project, which was to be done in November, 2009, just seems to have been mismanaged from the get-go. Putting all that aside it would be interesting if onmilwaukee could track down those in charge and see if the June deadline is still feasible.
| Rate this: |
tmw799 | May 31, 2010 at 8:01 a.m. (report)
Well, here it is, May 31, 2010. The crews have 30 days to complete the project according to the schedule. I jog by the bridge every morning and sometimes stop to watch the crew work. I have never seen such an unproductive team. An example: I have seen them use the big crane to remove 12 foot long 2x4s from concrete forms - one at a time - and the forms were within reach by the guys breaking them loose. I laugh every day at what I see.
| Rate this: |
bman | Nov. 12, 2009 at 8:10 p.m. (report)
Red, I am 100% for people appreciating my logic, you have good taste:) Unfortunately I like to keep my personal opinions separate from my business. I have a habit of getting on my soapbox, and sometimes what I say may not always sit well with some customers or other local business owners. More than likely you have already spent $$ at my place. It is appreciated.
| Rate this: |
are-gee | Nov. 12, 2009 at 9:52 a.m. (report)
Ask the merchants on Prospect between Windsor and Woodstock how the refurbishing of the bridge there affected their businesses. They were given short notice that it was going to happen, and the project dragged on past the original completion date and lay idle for days at a time. If SE Wisconsin really cared about bringing business to/keeping business in the area, the region would take more care with this. Maybe take away some of the exorbitant salaries of some of the regional development executives and give it to these businesses as compensation as their business tanks during these downtimes.
| Rate this: |
iabston | Nov. 12, 2009 at 9:11 a.m. (report)
Thanks OnMKE for the article. Though i think the city should have taken a proactive approach and reached out to you and other media channels to explain the situation. Soil obstruction? Do they make a Hallmark card for the "sorry I closed your business" occasion?
| Rate this: |
Show me the other 8 Talkbacks
|
13 comments about this article.
Post a comment / write a review. |
Facebook Comments
Disclaimer: Please note that Facebook comments are posted through Facebook and cannot be approved, edited or declined by OnMilwaukee.com. The opinions expressed in Facebook comments do not necessarily reflect those of OnMilwaukee.com or its staff.
Like Us
Follow Us















