![]() | duimanual: Winning Your Dwi Or Dui Case - Law: The Criminal Case of DWI All state s have laws that preclude drunk driving .. link about 11 hours ago |
![]() | DaHeartlessLova: B4 or after lol RT @beaufp Just got pulled over and tried to get me for drunk driving! Slayed and passed the test.Real thing is I slayed him about 16 hours ago |
![]() | Alicebabyy: RT @SkyWalkDC: RT @DiorBoyTellEm: yall be safe 2nite..no car accidents or drunk driving!! >>>> @OhhthatsMC lol about 20 hours ago |
![]() | SkyWalkDC: RT @DiorBoyTellEm: yall be safe 2nite..no car accidents or drunk driving!! about 20 hours ago |
| DiorBoyTellEm: yall be safe 2nite..no car accidents or drunk driving!! about 20 hours ago |
![]() |
Could a sobriety checkpoint be coming to a highway near you? |
| By Doug Hissom Special to OnMilwaukee.com E-mail author | Author bio More articles by Doug Hissom |
| Published June 5, 2009 at 5:27 a.m. |
|
Lawmakers are considering stiffening penalties for drunk driving in the state and the Milwaukee County Sheriff's Department has an idea -- just one -- to help.
Sobriety checkpoints are the solution, Sheriff's Department representatives said this week at a hearing in front of the state Senate's Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform and Housing Committee.
"We cannot arrest our way out of this problem," said one sheriff's rep, adding that checkpoints would actually reduce drunk driving arrests somehow.
"We're asking for a change of engineers. We're interested in sweeping reforms."
The representatives said checkpoints would actually be an educational device because officers could hand out business cards and offer advice on safe driving to the sober motorists they stop.
Attorney General JB Van Hollen won his race two years ago in large part because of his opposition to such checkpoints, which are used in many other states, particularly in the south.
I went through a checkpoint in South Carolina on U.S. 1 after a NASCAR event and was told, "Please fasten your seatbelt, sir."
Done Deals: Milwaukee County Executive Scott Walker put his signature on the sale of 89 acres of county land in Wauwatosa to UW-Milwaukee for a new engineering school. The county will get $13.5 million in the deal, which dashed city hopes that the university would consider expanding its footprint Downtown.
UWM also quietly stopped its bid to build a new building on the site of the former Pieces of Eight restaurant. The school had pitched the location for a new freshwater sciences school until environmentalists and other green space advocates rallied against it.
An ironic point to the university pitch was that it would have built a building on landfill on the lake, which would violate state law and require a special permit to do so.
Job Watch: The Madison-based Center on Wisconsin Strategy has put together a new feature focusing on the business of Wisconsin jobs. Some interesting findings from COWS show a grim scene:
It's Still Not OK: A trial court dismissed a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of lesbian state employees and their partners seeking domestic partner health insurance and family leave protections, but the American Civil Liberties Union sees it as a victory for their cause.
The court said that although it believes it is unconstitutional for the state to continue to deny the employees equal health insurance coverage and family leave protection, it is bound by a prior decision from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals from 1992.
"Losing doesn't get any better than this," said Larry Dupuis, litigation director of the ACLU. "We knew we had an uphill battle in the trial court because of the earlier case. But the court agreed with us that discrimination based on sexual orientation should be subject to strict judicial review and that it is unconstitutional for the state to deny equal benefits."
Recall Fever: The fun bunch at Citizens for Responsible Government have put their effort to recall Gov. Jim Doyle on the Web. RecallDoyle.com offers no real or legal reasons to recall the governor. Perhaps it's just something to do in the summer. CRG flacks say more than 3,000 people have signed up to help the recall effort and it will officially launch when 10,000 volunteers are in the game.
"Thomas Jefferson wrote 'That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government,'" CRG leader Orville Seymer said in a statement.
"We have the right in the Wisconsin Constitution to recall our representatives who have broken their promises and are piling up billions of dollars of debt for our children and our grandchildren."
|
6 comments about this article. Post a comment / write a review. |
Posted by mike3333 on June 17, 2009 at 12:44 p.m. (report)
Dear RideNoEvo: Driving a car is a right, not a privilege. We have given the state the privilege of regulating one of our rights.
| Rate this: |
Posted by mike3333 on June 17, 2009 at 12:41 p.m. (report)
Let's do these checkpoints right: Include: 1. German Shepherds on leashes. 2. Some kind of red armbands. 3. The phrase: "Good evening; papers, please."
| Rate this: |
Posted by jjrakman on June 10, 2009 at 2:19 p.m. (report)
Checkpoints will accomplish nothing. The problem does not lie with the lack of some new silly law, rather the problem lies with the lack of stiff penalties. Make all the checkpoints and new laws you want, but if you have judges supporting a revolving door policy in the courts for the offenders, it's all pointless. All this really is, is one more great reason to leave Wisconsin.
| Rate this: |
Posted by High_Life_Man on June 5, 2009 at 5:14 p.m. (report)
Agree with Alba. I don't think the state wants drunk driving to go completely away. I'm sure it brings in tons of money.
| Rate this: |
Posted by RideNoEvo on June 5, 2009 at 4:39 p.m. (report)
Dear Alba, While you have the right to not agree with the idea of checkpoints I think that your examples are a bit off. It would only be the same if you were required to be licensed to walk down the sidewalk or own a home, which you are not. Driving a car is a privilage not a right, both the driver and car must be licensed and meet other requiements in order to operate on the road. Furthermore drunk driving is a real problem in our city/state and some thing needs to be done. The answer to the problem might not be check points but it is one avenue that seems to work elsewhere. If we are not to use checkpoints then what else would you suggest we do to help solve the problem?? Not saying that your point doesn't have some value but just wondering what you would suggest
| Rate this: |
| Top Clicks | Top Searches | Most Talkbacks |